


Why is the size of a C struct with short members not always a multiple of the member size?
Understanding Memory Alignment in C Structs
Memory alignment is a crucial concept in C programming as it impacts the way data is stored in memory and accessed by the processor. In the context of structs, memory alignment dictates how individual members of a struct are laid out in memory.
Consider the following struct:
<code class="c">typedef struct { unsigned short v1; unsigned short v2; unsigned short v3; } myStruct;</code>
On a 32-bit machine where memory alignment is typically set to 4 bytes, one would expect the total size of this struct to be 8 bytes. However, the sizeof(myStruct) operator returns only 6 bytes.
The discrepancy arises because each member of the struct, being an unsigned short, has a size of 2 bytes. Since all members are of the same size, no padding is inserted between them. As a result, the struct occupies 6 bytes in memory.
Now, let's modify the struct:
<code class="c">typedef struct { unsigned short v1; unsigned short v2; unsigned short v3; int i; } myStruct;</code>
In this case, the presence of an int member, which has a size of 4 bytes, changes the memory alignment of the struct. The int member must be aligned on a 4-byte boundary. Since it is preceded by 6 bytes, 2 bytes of padding are inserted between v3 and i. This brings the total size of the struct to 12 bytes, as confirmed by sizeof(myStruct).
In summary, memory alignment in C structs ensures that members are properly aligned in memory to optimize processor performance and reduce memory usage. Types are only aligned to a boundary as large as the type itself. When a larger type is introduced, it sets the alignment for the entire struct, potentially introducing padding to maintain the desired alignment.
The above is the detailed content of Why is the size of a C struct with short members not always a multiple of the member size?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The performance differences between C# and C are mainly reflected in execution speed and resource management: 1) C usually performs better in numerical calculations and string operations because it is closer to hardware and has no additional overhead such as garbage collection; 2) C# is more concise in multi-threaded programming, but its performance is slightly inferior to C; 3) Which language to choose should be determined based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
