search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++Which implementation of C++ templates is better?

Comparison of explicit instantiation and implicit instantiation: Explicit instantiation allows finer control over code generation, avoiding errors and speeding up compilation. Implicit instantiation is more convenient, general, and avoids duplication, but may take longer to compile and may cause code bloat. Recommended use: Use implicit instantiation in most cases, but explicit instantiation may be more appropriate for specific cases where optimization is required, disabling implicit instantiation, or reducing compile time/code size.

C++ 模板的哪种实现方式更优?

Explicit and Implicit instantiation of C++ templates: Which is better?

In C++ template programming, there are two ways to instantiate templates: explicit instantiation and implicit instantiation. Both have their pros and cons, and understanding their differences can help make the right choice.

Explicit Instantiation

explicit Instantiation explicitly creates a specific template instance. The syntax is as follows:

template<>
class MyClass<T> {
  ...
};

Implicit instantiation

When the compiler uses a template, if an explicit instantiation does not exist, the compiler will automatically generate an implicit instantiation.

Advantages

  • Code generation control: Explicit instantiation provides fine-grained control over code generation, allowing optimization of specific instances.
  • Avoid compilation errors: For templates with complex template parameters, explicit instantiation can prevent compilation errors because the compiler does not try to generate all possible instances.
  • Faster compilation: For rarely used templates, explicit instantiation can reduce compilation time because the compiler only generates instances that are actually needed.

Disadvantages

  • Length: For large or general templates, writing explicit instantiations can be verbose.
  • Error-prone: If you forget to instantiate a specific template instance, it may cause compilation errors.

Implicit instantiation

Advantages

  • Convenient: Not required Manually write instantiation code.
  • Universal: Automatically applies to all template parameter values.
  • Avoid duplication: The compiler only generates template instances once.

Disadvantages

  • Long compilation time: For large or general templates, the compiler generates all possible instances Will result in longer compilation time.
  • Code bloat: May cause the executable size to increase due to all instances being generated.

Practical case

Consider a template function that calculates the maximum of two numbers:

template<typename T>
T max(T a, T b) {
  return (a > b) ? a : b;
}

explicit Instantiation:

// 显式实例化整数版本
template<>
inline int max<int>(int a, int b) {
  return (a > b) ? a : b;
}

Implicit Instantiation:

No need for explicit instantiation, the compiler will automatically generate instances of all types when used.

Recommended use

In most cases, implicit instantiation is a more convenient and versatile method. However, explicit instantiation may be superior for

explicit instantiation
    when
  • when optimization is required for a specific type of template instance.
  • When implicit instantiation of a specific type is explicitly prohibited.
When you need to reduce compilation time and executable file size. ######

The above is the detailed content of Which implementation of C++ templates is better?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
C# vs. C   Performance: Benchmarking and ConsiderationsC# vs. C Performance: Benchmarking and ConsiderationsApr 25, 2025 am 12:25 AM

The performance differences between C# and C are mainly reflected in execution speed and resource management: 1) C usually performs better in numerical calculations and string operations because it is closer to hardware and has no additional overhead such as garbage collection; 2) C# is more concise in multi-threaded programming, but its performance is slightly inferior to C; 3) Which language to choose should be determined based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C  : Is It Dying or Simply Evolving?C : Is It Dying or Simply Evolving?Apr 24, 2025 am 12:13 AM

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

C   in the Modern World: Applications and IndustriesC in the Modern World: Applications and IndustriesApr 23, 2025 am 12:10 AM

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

C   XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsC XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsApr 22, 2025 am 12:05 AM

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C   and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportC and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportApr 21, 2025 am 12:02 AM

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

C# vs. C  : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesC# vs. C : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesApr 20, 2025 am 12:03 AM

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

C# vs. C  : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsC# vs. C : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsApr 19, 2025 am 12:07 AM

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

C# vs. C  : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceC# vs. C : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceApr 18, 2025 am 12:13 AM

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

mPDF

mPDF

mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

Powerful PHP integrated development environment