


Is there a reason why `strings.EqualFold` doesn't do a length comparison first?
php Editor Apple, today we will discuss the reason why the `strings.EqualFold` function does not first perform a length comparison when comparing whether strings are equal. In string comparison, we often use the `strings.EqualFold` function to ignore case for comparison. However, some may wonder why this function doesn't perform a length comparison first? In the following article, we will answer this question and discuss the rationale of this design. Let’s take a look!
Question content
A common practice for comparing case-insensitive strings is to first explicitly check the length:
if len(a) == len(b) && strings.EqualFold(a, b) { ... }
This seems to be a workaround, as the current implementation only performs a length check when either of the two input strings is exhausted.
Is there a reason, performance or otherwise, not to do a length check first?
Solution
The short answer is because in Go 2 strings can have different lengths but still be equal under simple Unicode case folding (so doing a length comparison first does not Determine case fold equality).
The longer answer is: Go stores strings in memory as UTF-8 bytes, and the built-in len()
function reports UTF -8 Number of bytes to encode. UTF-8 is a variable-length character encoding: it may use a different number of bytes for a single unicode code point, so matching case-folding code points may use a different number of bytes in UTF-8.
Look at an example to prove this:
s1, s2 := "\u017F", "\u0073" fmt.Println(s1, s2) fmt.Println(len(s1), len(s2), strings.EqualFold(s1, s2))
This will output (try it on Go Playground):
ſ s 2 1 true
The above is the detailed content of Is there a reason why `strings.EqualFold` doesn't do a length comparison first?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!
