search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangIssue with required_if combination in github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 package

github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 包中的 required_if 组合问题

php editor Baicao is here to introduce to you a question about the required_if combination in the github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 package. When using this package for data validation, sometimes we need to determine whether other fields are required based on the value of a certain field. At this time, you can use the required_if combination rule to achieve this requirement. It can determine whether a field is required based on specified conditions, which is very flexible and practical. In this article, we will detail how to use required_if combination rules to solve this problem.

Question content

Software package version, for example. v9, v10:

Package version: v10

Questions, problems or improvements: When I try to run the code below. I'm getting this error, it's wired

Output

Validation error: Key: 'Application.Applicants[0].Entity.Name' Error:Field validation for 'Name' failed on the 'required' tag
Key: 'Application.Applicants[0].Entity.TaxID' Error:Field validation for 'TaxID' failed on the 'required' tag
Key: 'Application.Applicants[1].Person.Name' Error:Field validation for 'Name' failed on the 'required' tag
Key: 'Application.Applicants[1].Person.Age' Error:Field validation for 'Age' failed on the 'required' tag
Key: 'Application.Applicants[1].Person.Email' Error:Field validation for 'Email' failed on the 'required' tag

Code examples for demonstration or reproduction:

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "github.com/go-playground/validator/v10"
)

type Application struct {
    Applicants []Applicant `validate:"dive"`
}

type Applicant struct {
    ApplicantCategory string `validate:"required,oneof=PERSON ENTITY"`
    Person            Person `validate:"required_if=ApplicantCategory PERSON"`
    Entity            Entity `validate:"required_if=ApplicantCategory ENTITY"`
}

type Person struct {
    Name  string `validate:"required"`
    Age   int    `validate:"required,gte=18"`
    Email string `validate:"required,email"`
}

type Entity struct {
    Name  string `validate:"required"`
    TaxID string `validate:"required"`
}

func main() {
    // Create a new validator instance
    v := validator.New()

    // Create an instance of Application to validate
    data := Application{
        Applicants: []Applicant{
            {
                ApplicantCategory: "PERSON",
                Person: Person{
                    Name:  "John Doe",
                    Age:   25,
                    Email: "[email protected]",
                },
            },
            {
                ApplicantCategory: "ENTITY",
                Entity: Entity{
                    Name:  "Example Corp",
                    TaxID: "123456789",
                },
            },
        },
    }

    // Use the validator to validate the Application struct and its Applicants
    if err := v.Struct(data); err != nil {
        fmt.Println("Validation error:", err)
    } else {
        fmt.Println("Validation passed")
    }
}

Unable to identify a problem in the code or validation package. Any help would be greatly appreciated...

Workaround

Add omitempty For example:

type Applicant struct {
    ApplicantCategory string `validate:"required,oneof=PERSON ENTITY"`
    Person            Person `validate:"required_if=ApplicantCategory PERSON,omitempty"`
    Entity            Entity `validate:"required_if=ApplicantCategory ENTITY,omitempty"`
}
Full example in

playground (note that this will not run reliably in the Playground due to the size of the number of imported packages).

The problem is that required_if causes the library to check if Person//Entity exists, but the library still validates an empty Person/Entity (and fails!). Adding omitempty means that the library will ignore empty struct; this provides the desired result because required_if will ensure that any required struct Not empty (meaning it will be validated).

Another option is to use pointers (playground):

type Applicant struct {
    ApplicantCategory string `validate:"required,oneof=PERSON ENTITY"`
    Person            *Person `validate:"required_if=ApplicantCategory PERSON"`
    Entity            *Entity `validate:"required_if=ApplicantCategory ENTITY"`
}

The difference here is that when there is no Entity, the value will be nil (as opposed to Entity which has a default value), which means validator Unable to verify.

Note: I recommend using v := validator.New(validator.WithRequiredStructEnabled()) (as per documentation).

The above is the detailed content of Issue with required_if combination in github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 package. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:stackoverflow. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
Golang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsGolang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsApr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedGolang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedApr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Why Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedWhy Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedApr 21, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed ComparisonGolang vs. C : Performance and Speed ComparisonApr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Is Golang Faster Than C  ? Exploring the LimitsIs Golang Faster Than C ? Exploring the LimitsApr 20, 2025 am 12:19 AM

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingGolang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang vs. C  : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceGolang vs. C : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisGolang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisApr 20, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux latest version

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools

DVWA

DVWA

Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software