


Deterministically generate RSA private keys with custom io.Reader using Go
php editor Baicao will introduce how to use Go language to deterministically generate RSA private keys through custom io.Reader interface. RSA is an asymmetric encryption algorithm commonly used for data encryption and digital signatures. When generating an RSA private key, we usually need to obtain random numbers from a random source, but sometimes we need to generate a deterministic private key according to specific rules. This article will explain in detail how to implement a custom io.Reader interface and use this interface to generate a deterministic RSA private key. By reading this article, you will learn this useful technique to give your cryptographic applications more flexibility and control.
Question content
For reasons that are probably best left unanswered, I need to generate unlimited rsa public/private keys. Note that this isn't used for anything highly secure, so please don't tell me not to do it, and yes, I know it's not ideal. What I mean by "infinite" is that I need an unknown number of them (billions to trillions) and creating them before using them is impossible.
Since this consumes infinite space and takes infinite time to generate, I need to do this at runtime.
However, I also need to have the same key pair for a given input. This means I need to deterministically recreate the rsa key based on the input.
I use go, usually you create the key using the following command,
k, err := rsa.generatekey(rand.reader, 2048)
Of course, the problem is that rand.reader
is served by crypto/rand
, so it cannot be seeded.
I thought it would be possible to provide my own reader implementation to achieve my goal. I looked at the source code for generatekey
and noticed that it was looking for prime numbers, so I implemented my own reader so that I could control the "random" prime numbers returned, allowing me to generate the same if needed The key,
type reader struct { data []byte sum int primes []int } func newreader(toread string) *reader { primes := sieveoferatosthenes(10_000_000) return &reader{[]byte(toread), 0, primes} } func (r *reader) read(p []byte) (n int, err error) { r.sum = r.sum + 1 if r.sum >= 100_000 { return r.primes[rand.intn(len(r.primes))], io.eof } return r.primes[rand.intn(len(r.primes))], nil } func sieveoferatosthenes(n int) (primes []int) { b := make([]bool, n) for i := 2; i < n; i++ { if b[i] == true { continue } primes = append(primes, i) for k := i * i; k < n; k += i { b[k] = true } } return }
Then I can call generate key like this
k, err := rsa.GenerateKey(NewReader(""), 2048)
It compiles but crashes at runtime due to a zero pointer. I'm pretty happy with go, but the implementation of rsa is beyond my understanding. Looking for better ways to achieve this, or looking for what I need to do to make it work for my readers.
Note that my only hard requirement here is to be able to generate the same key for a given input, using rsa.generatekey
or a compatible replacement. The input can be literally anything as long as I get the same key as the output.
Here is a go playground link showing where I am currently https://go.dev/play/p/jd1naopr5ad
Workaround
read
Method did not perform the expected operation. It does not pad the input p
byte slice with random bytes. If you look at the unix implementation of the crypto/rand.read
method, it passes a slice of input bytes to another reader. So basically you need to fill the byte slice with random numbers. For example:
func (r *reader) read(p []byte) (n int, err error) { i := 0 b := p for i < len(b) { if len(b) < 4 { b[0] = 7 b = b[1:] } else { binary.littleendian.putuint32(b, uint32(rand.intn(len(r.primes)))) b = b[4:] } } return len(p), nil }
This is the link to the playground .
renew
As erwin mentioned in his answer, there is a function called maybereadrand
which has a 50% chance of reading 1 byte from the rand reader, making the function unique Certainty. But you can solve it by adding an if statement in the read method: if the length of the input slice is 1, ignore everything and return. Otherwise, provide prime numbers to the input slice:
func (r *Reader) Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) { i := 0 b := p if len(p) == 1 { println("maybeReadRand") return 1, nil } for i < len(b) { if len(b) < 4 { b[0] = 7 b = b[1:] } else { binary.LittleEndian.PutUint32(b, uint32(r.primes[r.i])) r.i++ b = b[4:] } } return len(p), nil }
In this snippet I create 2 keys and they are both equal. p>
The above is the detailed content of Deterministically generate RSA private keys with custom io.Reader using Go. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version