search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangGin's Fizz OpenAPi generator is renaming types

Gin 的 Fizz OpenAPi 生成器正在重命名类型

Question content

I created a simple api written in gin. I use fizz to generate the openapi 3 spec. This is my post endpoint:

// sets user route group
func userroute(grp *fizz.routergroup) {

    // create new user
    grp.post("", []fizz.operationoption{
        fizz.summary("creates new user and sends verification mail."),
        ...
    }, tonic.handler(handlers.createuser, 201))
}

This is the handler method:

// Creates new user
func CreateUser(c *gin.Context, register *models.Register) error {
    ...

    return nil
}

The problem is that in the generated json spec, the "register" model is shown as "createuserinput":

Is there any way to solve this problem? Or is this normal?


Correct answer


According to implementation, the schema name is generated by the following statement: name := strings.title(op.id) "input" (see line 23 below):

1  // setOperationParams adds the fields of the struct type t
 2  // to the given operation.
 3  func (g *Generator) setOperationParams(op *Operation, t, parent reflect.Type, allowBody bool, path string) error {
 4      if t.Kind() != reflect.Struct {
 5          return errors.New("input type is not a struct")
 6      }
 7      if err := g.buildParamsRecursive(op, t, parent, allowBody); err != nil {
 8          return err
 9      }
10      // Input fields that are neither path- nor query-bound
11      // have been extracted into the operation's RequestBody
12      // If the RequestBody is not nil, give it a name and
13      // move it to the openapi spec's components/schemas section
14      // Replace the RequestBody's schema with a reference
15      // to the named schema in components/schemas
16      if op.RequestBody != nil {
17          mt := tonic.MediaType()
18          if mt == "" {
19              mt = anyMediaType
20          }
21          sch := op.RequestBody.Content[mt].Schema
22          if sch != nil {
23              name := strings.Title(op.ID) + "Input"
24              g.api.Components.Schemas[name] = sch
25              op.RequestBody.Content[mt].Schema = &SchemaOrRef{Reference: &Reference{
26                  Ref: componentsSchemaPath + name,
27              }}
28          }
29      }

You can use fizz.id to customize the operation id, but there is no way to remove the input suffix. If you really want to generate schema names differently, you'll need to fork the repository and modify the implementation.

The above is the detailed content of Gin's Fizz OpenAPi generator is renaming types. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:stackoverflow. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
Golang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsGolang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsApr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedGolang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedApr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Why Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedWhy Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedApr 21, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed ComparisonGolang vs. C : Performance and Speed ComparisonApr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Is Golang Faster Than C  ? Exploring the LimitsIs Golang Faster Than C ? Exploring the LimitsApr 20, 2025 am 12:19 AM

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingGolang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang vs. C  : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceGolang vs. C : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisGolang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisApr 20, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Safe Exam Browser

Safe Exam Browser

Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

Atom editor mac version download

Atom editor mac version download

The most popular open source editor

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

SecLists

SecLists

SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.