U.S. Congressional hearings and nine key moments with the founder of OpenAI ChatGPT

May 17th news, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman (Sam Altman) yesterday responded to the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee’s question about the potential threatening consequences of generative artificial intelligence. . Altman encouraged lawmakers to quickly enact new AI laws and regulations that would set standards for how OpenAI, Google and other tech companies can develop new AI systems.

“We believe government regulatory intervention is critical to mitigating the risks posed by increasingly powerful AI,” Altman said at the hearing.

Altman and other expert witnesses who testified agreed that ChatGPT’s model, if left unregulated, could increase misinformation on the web, fuel cybercrime, and even threaten electoral systems. Lawmakers and Altman discussed many potential policies and solutions, even considering the creation of a new AI regulatory agency to oversee the development and deployment of AI technology.

1. Richard Blumenthal used ChatGPT to pretend to be himself and wrote a statement

Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal A "recording of him" was played at the start of the hearing. This recording was not produced by the senator himself, but was a "work" generated by a voice cloning software after reading the text generated by ChatGPT.

“This is not the future we want,” said the AI-generated Blumenthal.

2. Altman asks Congress to regulate artificial intelligence (but just a little, not too much)

Altman admits that his product and other artificial intelligence products may bring unexpected results With the fallout, he welcomes Congress to set new regulatory standards, set rules for the road and, perhaps more importantly, set rules for his competitors.

Altman believes that the intervention of government regulation is critical to mitigating the risks posed by ever-increasing artificial intelligence models. Altman urged lawmakers to focus on reining in big companies and avoid stifling smaller startups.

3. Congress is trying to avoid repeating the mistake of failing to regulate social media

Including Senator Blumenthal and New Jersey Senator Cory Booker Several lawmakers warned that they had made mistakes in preventing social media from becoming a source of misinformation and harmful content. Redemption may come through regulation of artificial intelligence.

Blumenthal said: "Congress failed to take timely action on social media, and now we have an obligation to take necessary steps on artificial intelligence before the threats and risks materialize."

4. Josh Hawley: Artificial intelligence may be the next printing press, or the next atomic bomb

Missouri Senator Josh Hawley believes that artificial intelligence like GPT4 Intelligence may develop in two distinct directions.

"We may be seeing one of the most important technological innovations in human history," Hawley said. I wonder what form this innovation will take, will it spread knowledge, ability and learning like the printing press, or more like the atomic bomb?

Others, such as South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, have echoed the atomic bomb rhetoric, although they have downplayed catastrophic AI doomsday scenarios.

5. Altman said artificial intelligence could "cause significant harm to the world"

Altman may not have compared artificial intelligence to nuclear weapons, as some lawmakers have done, but he admitted that he Concerned that their products could "cause significant harm to the world." These harms may manifest themselves through spreading mass disinformation, conducting scams, causing mass unemployment, and disrupting the reality of the network.

Altmann assured senators that he believed the "benefits of AI far outweigh the risks," but acknowledged that government intervention and regulation could be critical to guarding against AI's side effects.

6. Marsha Blackburn is uneasy about artificial intelligence

Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn used an unexpected example to raise questions about the use of artificial intelligence models. Controversy over copyrighted material: AI Garth Brooks.

Altman learned that a senator said she had heard that an artificial intelligence trained by a country singer had successfully produced a convincing adaptation of his work. Blackburn cited the case as a way to require artists to receive compensation from Altman when their work is used to train artificial intelligence. Although Altmann seemed open to compensating artists, he did not offer any concrete solutions.

7. Altman said that the impact of artificial intelligence on society may be like "steroids" for Photoshop

Altman admitted that artificial intelligence may enable users through sophisticated chatbots and deep fakes Becoming more and more worried. While he admits he's "concerned," Altman said society is exhibiting a similar phenomenon with Adobe's Photoshop.

“I think people will adapt pretty quickly,” Altman said. “A long time ago, when Photoshop appeared in front of people, people would be deceived by the photoshopped images at first, but this phenomenon would not last long. It was like athletes taking steroids.

8 , an AI skeptic agrees with Altman’s idea of ​​creating a government department for artificial intelligence and the Law and Justice Subcommittee.

Altman and a handful of lawmakers on the Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology & Law seemed to agree that an expert-led A new artificial intelligence agency that would be able to regulate the development and deployment of artificial intelligence. The proposed agency would be independent from other regulators, such as the FTC and FCC, and could theoretically issue licenses to artificial intelligence companies and revoke those deemed Licenses for unqualified companies. Gary Marcus, an artificial intelligence researcher and former New York University professor, testified at the hearing. He supported the establishment of an artificial intelligence regulatory agency and said that the agency should work closely with international partners to develop Global Artificial Intelligence Standards.

9. Altman asked legislators: Can ChatGPT users sue him?

Lawmakers and experts who spoke at the hearing may have raised concerns about some of the problems caused by artificial intelligence There is consensus on the harm to society, but not much input on what users who have been affected can currently do to hold OpenAI or other AI companies accountable for the harm. For example, lawmakers and experts disagree about chatbots Predicted whether social media companies should get the same immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Altman seemed confused when Hawley asked directly what recourse users had.

“People can’t sue Us? Altmann asked. Worryingly, the answer to this seemingly simple question remains unclear. "I don't know what the right answer is yet." ”

The above is the detailed content of U.S. Congressional hearings and nine key moments with the founder of OpenAI ChatGPT. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!