Managing Asynchronous Tasks in C#/XAML Metro Style Apps
In C#/XAML Metro style applications, handling long-running operations asynchronously using async
/await
is crucial to prevent UI freezes. However, situations arise where pausing and resuming these operations based on user interaction is needed.
Utilizing SemaphoreSlim for Event-Driven Pausing
The SemaphoreSlim
class offers an elegant solution for event-based suspension:
- Initialize a
SemaphoreSlim
object with an initial count of 0 and a maximum count of 1:private SemaphoreSlim signal = new SemaphoreSlim(0, 1);
- Upon a "continue" button click, release the semaphore:
signal.Release();
- Within your long-running method (e.g.,
GetResults
), wait for the semaphore signal:await signal.WaitAsync();
Employing TaskCompletionSource
Another effective approach involves the TaskCompletionSource<bool></bool>
class:
- Declare a
TaskCompletionSource<bool></bool>
:private TaskCompletionSource<bool> tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<bool>();</bool></bool>
- On the "continue" button click, set the task's result:
tcs.SetResult(true);
- In your asynchronous operation, await the task:
await tcs.Task;
Advantages of Event-Driven Pause/Resume
These methods avoid the inefficiencies of polling, eliminating busy-waiting and resource waste. By employing event-driven mechanisms, you achieve efficient pause and resume functionality for long-running asynchronous tasks.
The above is the detailed content of How to Suspend and Resume Asynchronous Operations in C#/XAML Metro Apps?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.