Unraveling the Enigma: std::make_pair Conundrum with Explicit Template Parameters
In the realm of C , the std::make_pair function has risen to prominence as a convenient tool for creating pairs. However, a peculiar issue arises when attempting to employ this function with explicitly specified template parameters in C 11. This article delves into the enigmatic behavior behind this situation.
Error at Hand
Consider the following code snippet that attempts to create a pair of a string and an integer with explicit template arguments:
std::pair<:string int>& b = std::make_pair<:string int>(s, 7);</:string></:string>
Instead of the expected compilation success, a cryptic error message emerges:
error: no matching function for call to 'make_pair(std::string&, int)'
Unveiling the Mystery
The source of this error lies in the incorrect usage of std::make_pair. The function was designed to infer the template parameters based on the provided arguments. Explicitly stating these parameters hinders this inference process.
Under the Hood
The C 11 implementation of std::make_pair takes two parameters of type T&& and U&&, where T and U are template type parameters. When explicitly specifying the template arguments, as seen in the problematic code, no argument deduction occurs. Instead, the specified types are directly substituted into the template declaration, resulting in the following:
make_pair(std::string&& argT, int&& argU);
The Crucial Role of Rvalue References
Note that both parameters in the explicitly specified template are rvalue references (&&), which can only bind to rvalue expressions. In the provided code, s is an lvalue (not a temporary and not being moved). Consequently, the function template fails to match the arguments, leading to the compilation error.
Why It Works Without Explicit Arguments
When omitting the explicit template arguments, argument deduction takes place. Due to the special nature of rvalue reference parameters in templates (reference collapsing), an rvalue reference parameter of type A&&, where A is a template type parameter, can bind to any type of A. Whether A is an lvalue, rvalue, qualified or not, an A&& can bind to it.
In the example code, s is an lvalue of type std::string and 7 is an rvalue of type int. The compiler deduces T to be std::string& and U to be int, allowing s and 7 to bind successfully to the inferred parameter types.
Conclusion
To avoid such errors, adhere to the following principle: If a template argument can be deduced from the function arguments, allow the compiler to perform the deduction. Explicitly providing arguments is often unnecessary and can lead to unexpected results. By harnessing the power of argument deduction, programmers can simplify their code and enhance its readability while maintaining its correctness.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `std::make_pair` Fail with Explicit Template Arguments in C 11?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)