The Perils of Deleting Void Pointers
In C , memory management is crucial, and understanding the proper usage of pointers is paramount. A common question arises when dealing with void pointers: is it safe to delete a void pointer directly?
Question:
Consider the following code:
void *my_alloc(size_t size) { return new char[size]; } void my_free(void *ptr) { delete[] ptr; }
Is this code safe, or must ptr be cast to char* before deletion?
Answer:
Deleting a void pointer is explicitly forbidden by the C Standard. Section 5.3.5/3 states that:
In the second alternative (delete array) if the dynamic type of the object to be deleted differs from its static type, the behavior is undefined.
This means that deleting an object using a void pointer is undefined because there are no objects of type void.
In simpler terms, a void pointer has no type information, so it cannot contain the necessary information to properly delete the allocated memory. Deleting via a void pointer may corrupt the memory heap and lead to unpredictable behavior or program crashes.
Therefore, it is essential to avoid deleting via void pointers and instead cast the void pointer to its appropriate type before deletion. In the given example, it would be necessary to cast ptr to char* before calling delete[]:
void my_free(void *ptr) { delete[] static_cast<char>(ptr); }</char>
By following this practice, you ensure that the memory is correctly deallocated, avoiding potential errors and maintaining the integrity of your program.
The above is the detailed content of Is it Safe to Delete a Void Pointer Directly in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function