


Initializer List or Constructor Body: Which is Best for C Field Initialization?
Initializer List vs. Constructor Body: Delving into Field Initialization
In the world of object-oriented programming with C , one common task is initializing class fields. While the initializer list and constructor body offer two distinct ways to do this, understanding the subtle difference between them is essential.
Initializer List
The initializer list syntax allows you to initialize member variables right at the beginning of the constructor, before its body executes. This is achieved using the : symbol, followed by a comma-separated list of assignments:
public: Thing(int _foo, int _bar): member1(_foo), member2(_bar) {}
Constructor Body
In the constructor body, field initialization occurs within the braces (after the parameter list). Each field is assigned explicitly using the equals sign:
public: Thing(int _foo, int _bar) { member1 = _foo; member2 = _bar; }
Difference for Non-POD Types
When dealing with non-POD (Plain Old Data) types, there's a crucial distinction between these two methods. Unlike the initializer list, which initializes such fields immediately, the constructor body initializes them only after the execution of its body starts.
This means that the constructor body implicitly calls the default constructor for each non-POD member, potentially resulting in double initialization. For instance:
public: Thing(int _foo, int _bar) { member1 = _foo; member2 = _bar; }
This is effectively equivalent to:
public: Thing(int _foo, int _bar) : member1(), member2() { member1 = _foo; member2 = _bar; }
Safety Implications
This difference can have implications for safety. If a non-POD member lacks a default constructor, using the constructor body will cause a compilation error. In contrast, the initializer list will simply skip initializing the member, which may be desirable or unwanted depending on the situation.
Default Parameters
Both the initializer list and constructor body support default parameter values. However, the behavior is identical, and the choice of method does not influence how default parameters are handled.
The above is the detailed content of Initializer List or Constructor Body: Which is Best for C Field Initialization?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.
