


Why Does `reinterpret_cast` Cause a Compilation Error When Initializing a `constexpr` Variable?
constexpr and reinterpret_cast: Error in C Compilation
Consider the following code snippet:
<br>struct foo {<br> static constexpr const void<em> ptr = reinterpret_cast<const void>>(0x1);<br>};<br></const></em>
This code compiles without errors in g v4.9, but fails in clang v3.4 with the error:
error: constexpr variable 'ptr' must be initialized by a constant expression
Which Compiler is Correct?
According to the C 11 standard, clang is correct. The standard states that a constant expression must not involve a reinterpret_cast. This means that the initialization of ptr in the code snippet is invalid.
Proper Initialization
The proper way to declare an expression of this type would be to use an alternative method, such as:
<br>struct foo {<br> static constexpr intptr_t ptr = 0x1;<br>};<br>
This would work in both clang and g .
Workaround for GCC
While GCC's acceptance of the original code snippet is technically incorrect, it does support a workaround using the __builtin_constant_p macro:
<br>struct foo {<br> static constexpr const void* ptr =<pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">__builtin_constant_p( reinterpret_cast<const void>(0x1) ) ? reinterpret_cast<const void>(0x1) : reinterpret_cast<const void>(0x1);</const></const></const>
};
This workaround allows GCC to fold the non-constant expression and treats it as a constant. However, it is not part of the C standard and should be used with caution.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `reinterpret_cast` Cause a Compilation Error When Initializing a `constexpr` Variable?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools
