Home >Backend Development >Python Tutorial >Polars vs. Pandas A New Era of Dataframes in Python ?
If you've been keeping up with recent Python developments, you’ve probably heard of Polars, a new library for working with data. While pandas has been the go-to library for a long time, Polars is making waves, especially for handling big datasets. So, what’s the big deal with Polars? How is it different from pandas? Let’s break it down.
Polars is a free, open-source library built in Rust (a fast, modern programming language). It’s designed to help Python developers handle data in a faster, more efficient way. Think of it as an alternative to pandas one that shines when you're working with really large datasets that pandas might struggle with.
Pandas has been around for years, and many people still love using it. But as data has gotten bigger and more complex, pandas has started to show some weaknesses. Ritchie Vink, the creator of Polars, noticed these issues and decided to create something faster and more efficient. Even Wes McKinney, the creator of pandas, admitted in a blog post titled "10 Things I Hate About pandas" that pandas could use some improvement, especially with large datasets.
That’s where Polars comes in it’s designed to be blazing fast and memory efficient, two things pandas struggles with when handling big data.
Polars is really fast. In fact, some benchmarks show that Polars can be up to 5–10 times faster than pandas when performing common operations, like filtering or grouping data. This speed difference is especially noticeable when you’re working with large datasets.
Polars is much more efficient when it comes to memory. It uses about 5 to 10 times less memory than pandas, which means you can work with much larger datasets without running into memory issues.
Polars uses something called lazy execution, which means it doesn’t immediately run each operation as you write it. Instead, it waits until you’ve written a series of operations, then runs them all at once. This helps it optimize and run things faster. Pandas, on the other hand, runs every operation immediately, which can be slower for big tasks.
Polars can use multiple CPU cores at the same time to process data, which makes it even faster for big datasets. Pandas is mostly single threaded, meaning it can only use one CPU core at a time, which slows things down, especially with large datasets.
Polars is fast for a couple of reasons:
This combination of Rust and Apache Arrow gives Polars the edge over pandas when it comes to speed and memory use.
While Polars is great for big data, pandas still has its place. Pandas works really well with small to medium-sized datasets and has been around for so long that it’s got tons of features and a huge community. So, if you’re not working with huge datasets, pandas might still be your best option.
However, as your datasets get larger, pandas tends to use more memory and gets slower, making Polars a better choice in those situations.
You should consider using Polars if:
Kedua-dua Polar dan panda mempunyai kekuatan mereka. Jika anda bekerja dengan set data kecil hingga sederhana, panda masih merupakan alat yang hebat. Tetapi jika anda berurusan dengan set data yang besar dan memerlukan sesuatu yang lebih pantas dan lebih cekap memori, Polar pastinya berbaloi untuk dicuba. Peningkatan prestasinya, terima kasih kepada Rust dan Apache Arrow, menjadikannya pilihan yang hebat untuk tugasan intensif data.
Memandangkan Python terus berkembang, Polars mungkin menjadi alat goto baharu untuk mengendalikan data besar.
Selamat Pengekodan ? ?
The above is the detailed content of Polars vs. Pandas A New Era of Dataframes in Python ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!