YOLO (You Only Look Once) has been a leading real-time object detection framework, with each iteration improving upon the previous versions. The latest version YOLO v12 introduces advancements that significantly enhance accuracy while maintaining real-time processing speeds. This article explores the key innovations in YOLO v12, highlighting how it surpasses the previous versions while minimizing computational costs without compromising detection efficiency.
Table of contents
- What’s New in YOLO v12?
- Key Improvements Over Previous Versions
- Computational Efficiency Enhancements
- YOLO v12 Model Variants
- Let’s compare YOLO v11 and YOLO v12 Models
- Expert Opinions on YOLOv11 and YOLOv12
- Conclusion
What’s New in YOLO v12?
Previously, YOLO models relied on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for object detection due to their speed and efficiency. However, YOLO v12 makes use of attention mechanisms, a concept widely known and used in Transformer models which allow it to recognize patterns more effectively. While attention mechanisms have originally been slow for real-time object detection, YOLO v12 somehow successfully integrates them while maintaining YOLO’s speed, leading to an Attention-Centric YOLO framework.
Key Improvements Over Previous Versions
1. Attention-Centric Framework
YOLO v12 combines the power of attention mechanisms with CNNs, resulting in a model that is both faster and more accurate. Unlike its predecessors which relied solely on CNNs, YOLO v12 introduces optimized attention modules to improve object recognition without adding unnecessary latency.
2. Superior Performance Metrics
Comparing performance metrics across different YOLO versions and real-time detection models reveals that YOLO v12 achieves higher accuracy while maintaining low latency.
- The mAP (Mean Average Precision) values on datasets like COCO show YOLO v12 outperforming YOLO v11 and YOLO v10 while maintaining comparable speed.
- The model achieves a remarkable 40.6% accuracy (mAP) while processing images in just 1.64 milliseconds on an Nvidia T4 GPU. This performance is superior to YOLO v10 and YOLO v11 without sacrificing speed.
3. Outperforming Non-YOLO Models
YOLO v12 surpasses previous YOLO versions; it also outperforms other real-time object detection frameworks, such as RT-Det and RT-Det v2. These alternative models have higher latency yet fail to match YOLO v12’s accuracy.
Computational Efficiency Enhancements
One of the major concerns with integrating attention mechanisms into YOLO models was their high computational cost (Attention Mechanism) and memory inefficiency. YOLO v12 addresses these issues through several key innovations:
1. Flash Attention for Memory Efficiency
Traditional attention mechanisms consume a large amount of memory, making them impractical for real-time applications. YOLO v12 introduces Flash Attention, a technique that reduces memory consumption and speeds up inference time.
2. Area Attention for Lower Computation Cost
To further optimize efficiency, YOLO v12 employs Area Attention, which focuses only on relevant regions of an image instead of processing the entire feature map. This technique dramatically reduces computation costs while retaining accuracy.
3. R-ELAN for Optimized Feature Processing
YOLO v12 also introduces R-ELAN (Re-Engineered ELAN), which optimizes feature propagation making the model more efficient in handling complex object detection tasks without increasing computational demands.
YOLO v12 Model Variants
YOLO v12 comes in five different variants, catering to different applications:
- N (Nano) & S (Small): Designed for real-time applications where speed is crucial.
- M (Medium): Balances accuracy and speed, suitable for general-purpose tasks.
- L (Large) & XL (Extra Large): Optimized for high-precision tasks where accuracy is prioritized over speed.
Also read:
- A Step-by-Step Introduction to the Basic Object Detection Algorithms (Part 1)
- A Practical Implementation of the Faster R-CNN Algorithm for Object Detection (Part 2)
- A Practical Guide to Object Detection using the Popular YOLO Framework – Part III (with Python codes)
Let’s compare YOLO v11 and YOLO v12 Models
We’ll be experimenting with YOLO v11 and YOLO v12 small models to understand their performance across various tasks like object counting, heatmaps, and speed estimation.
1. Object Counting
YOLO v11
import cv2 from ultralytics import solutions cap = cv2.VideoCapture("highway.mp4") assert cap.isOpened(), "Error reading video file" w, h, fps = (int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_WIDTH)), int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_HEIGHT)), int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FPS))) # Define region points region_points = [(20, 1500), (1080, 1500), (1080, 1460), (20, 1460)] # Lower rectangle region counting # Video writer (MP4 format) video_writer = cv2.VideoWriter("object_counting_output.mp4", cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*"mp4v"), fps, (w, h)) # Init ObjectCounter counter = solutions.ObjectCounter( show=False, # Disable internal window display region=region_points, model="yolo11s.pt", ) # Process video while cap.isOpened(): success, im0 = cap.read() if not success: print("Video frame is empty or video processing has been successfully completed.") break im0 = counter.count(im0) # Resize to fit screen (optional — scale down for large videos) im0_resized = cv2.resize(im0, (640, 360)) # Adjust resolution as needed # Show the resized frame cv2.imshow("Object Counting", im0_resized) video_writer.write(im0) # Press 'q' to exit if cv2.waitKey(1) & 0xFF == ord('q'): break cap.release() video_writer.release() cv2.destroyAllWindows()
Output
YOLO v12
import cv2 from ultralytics import solutions cap = cv2.VideoCapture("highway.mp4") assert cap.isOpened(), "Error reading video file" w, h, fps = (int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_WIDTH)), int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_HEIGHT)), int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FPS))) # Define region points region_points = [(20, 1500), (1080, 1500), (1080, 1460), (20, 1460)] # Lower rectangle region counting # Video writer (MP4 format) video_writer = cv2.VideoWriter("object_counting_output.mp4", cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*"mp4v"), fps, (w, h)) # Init ObjectCounter counter = solutions.ObjectCounter( show=False, # Disable internal window display region=region_points, model="yolo12s.pt", ) # Process video while cap.isOpened(): success, im0 = cap.read() if not success: print("Video frame is empty or video processing has been successfully completed.") break im0 = counter.count(im0) # Resize to fit screen (optional — scale down for large videos) im0_resized = cv2.resize(im0, (640, 360)) # Adjust resolution as needed # Show the resized frame cv2.imshow("Object Counting", im0_resized) video_writer.write(im0) # Press 'q' to exit if cv2.waitKey(1) & 0xFF == ord('q'): break cap.release() video_writer.release() cv2.destroyAllWindows()
Output
2. Heatmaps
YOLO v11
import cv2 from ultralytics import solutions cap = cv2.VideoCapture("mall_arial.mp4") assert cap.isOpened(), "Error reading video file" w, h, fps = (int(cap.get(x)) for x in (cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_WIDTH, cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_HEIGHT, cv2.CAP_PROP_FPS)) # Video writer video_writer = cv2.VideoWriter("heatmap_output_yolov11.mp4", cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*"mp4v"), fps, (w, h)) # In case you want to apply object counting + heatmaps, you can pass region points. # region_points = [(20, 400), (1080, 400)] # Define line points # region_points = [(20, 400), (1080, 400), (1080, 360), (20, 360)] # Define region points # region_points = [(20, 400), (1080, 400), (1080, 360), (20, 360), (20, 400)] # Define polygon points # Init heatmap heatmap = solutions.Heatmap( show=True, # Display the output model="yolo11s.pt", # Path to the YOLO11 model file colormap=cv2.COLORMAP_PARULA, # Colormap of heatmap # region=region_points, # If you want to do object counting with heatmaps, you can pass region_points # classes=[0, 2], # If you want to generate heatmap for specific classes i.e person and car. # show_in=True, # Display in counts # show_out=True, # Display out counts # line_width=2, # Adjust the line width for bounding boxes and text display ) # Process video while cap.isOpened(): success, im0 = cap.read() if not success: print("Video frame is empty or video processing has been successfully completed.") break im0 = heatmap.generate_heatmap(im0) im0_resized = cv2.resize(im0, (w, h)) video_writer.write(im0_resized) cap.release() video_writer.release() cv2.destroyAllWindows()
Output
YOLO v12
import cv2 from ultralytics import solutions cap = cv2.VideoCapture("mall_arial.mp4") assert cap.isOpened(), "Error reading video file" w, h, fps = (int(cap.get(x)) for x in (cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_WIDTH, cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_HEIGHT, cv2.CAP_PROP_FPS)) # Video writer video_writer = cv2.VideoWriter("heatmap_output_yolov12.mp4", cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*"mp4v"), fps, (w, h)) # In case you want to apply object counting + heatmaps, you can pass region points. # region_points = [(20, 400), (1080, 400)] # Define line points # region_points = [(20, 400), (1080, 400), (1080, 360), (20, 360)] # Define region points # region_points = [(20, 400), (1080, 400), (1080, 360), (20, 360), (20, 400)] # Define polygon points # Init heatmap heatmap = solutions.Heatmap( show=True, # Display the output model="yolo12s.pt", # Path to the YOLO11 model file colormap=cv2.COLORMAP_PARULA, # Colormap of heatmap # region=region_points, # If you want to do object counting with heatmaps, you can pass region_points # classes=[0, 2], # If you want to generate heatmap for specific classes i.e person and car. # show_in=True, # Display in counts # show_out=True, # Display out counts # line_width=2, # Adjust the line width for bounding boxes and text display ) # Process video while cap.isOpened(): success, im0 = cap.read() if not success: print("Video frame is empty or video processing has been successfully completed.") break im0 = heatmap.generate_heatmap(im0) im0_resized = cv2.resize(im0, (w, h)) video_writer.write(im0_resized) cap.release() video_writer.release() cv2.destroyAllWindows()
Output
3. Speed Estimation
YOLO v11
import cv2 from ultralytics import solutions import numpy as np cap = cv2.VideoCapture("cars_on_road.mp4") assert cap.isOpened(), "Error reading video file" # Capture video properties w = int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_WIDTH)) h = int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_HEIGHT)) fps = int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FPS)) # Video writer video_writer = cv2.VideoWriter("speed_management_yolov11.mp4", cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*"mp4v"), fps, (w, h)) # Define speed region points (adjust for your video resolution) speed_region = [(300, h - 200), (w - 100, h - 200), (w - 100, h - 270), (300, h - 270)] # Initialize SpeedEstimator speed = solutions.SpeedEstimator( show=False, # Disable internal window display model="yolo11s.pt", # Path to the YOLO model file region=speed_region, # Pass region points # classes=[0, 2], # Optional: Filter specific object classes (e.g., cars, trucks) # line_width=2, # Optional: Adjust the line width ) # Process video while cap.isOpened(): success, im0 = cap.read() if not success: print("Video frame is empty or video processing has been successfully completed.") break # Estimate speed and draw bounding boxes out = speed.estimate_speed(im0) # Draw the speed region on the frame cv2.polylines(out, [np.array(speed_region)], isClosed=True, color=(0, 255, 0), thickness=2) # Resize the frame to fit the screen im0_resized = cv2.resize(out, (1280, 720)) # Resize for better screen fit # Show the resized frame cv2.imshow("Speed Estimation", im0_resized) video_writer.write(out) # Press 'q' to exit if cv2.waitKey(1) & 0xFF == ord('q'): break cap.release() video_writer.release() cv2.destroyAllWindows()
Output
YOLO v12
import cv2 from ultralytics import solutions import numpy as np cap = cv2.VideoCapture("cars_on_road.mp4") assert cap.isOpened(), "Error reading video file" # Capture video properties w = int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_WIDTH)) h = int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FRAME_HEIGHT)) fps = int(cap.get(cv2.CAP_PROP_FPS)) # Video writer video_writer = cv2.VideoWriter("speed_management_yolov12.mp4", cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*"mp4v"), fps, (w, h)) # Define speed region points (adjust for your video resolution) speed_region = [(300, h - 200), (w - 100, h - 200), (w - 100, h - 270), (300, h - 270)] # Initialize SpeedEstimator speed = solutions.SpeedEstimator( show=False, # Disable internal window display model="yolo12s.pt", # Path to the YOLO model file region=speed_region, # Pass region points # classes=[0, 2], # Optional: Filter specific object classes (e.g., cars, trucks) # line_width=2, # Optional: Adjust the line width ) # Process video while cap.isOpened(): success, im0 = cap.read() if not success: print("Video frame is empty or video processing has been successfully completed.") break # Estimate speed and draw bounding boxes out = speed.estimate_speed(im0) # Draw the speed region on the frame cv2.polylines(out, [np.array(speed_region)], isClosed=True, color=(0, 255, 0), thickness=2) # Resize the frame to fit the screen im0_resized = cv2.resize(out, (1280, 720)) # Resize for better screen fit # Show the resized frame cv2.imshow("Speed Estimation", im0_resized) video_writer.write(out) # Press 'q' to exit if cv2.waitKey(1) & 0xFF == ord('q'): break cap.release() video_writer.release() cv2.destroyAllWindows()
Output
Also Read: Top 30+ Computer Vision Models For 2025
Expert Opinions on YOLOv11 and YOLOv12
Muhammad Rizwan Munawar — Computer Vision Engineer at Ultralytics
“YOLOv12 introduces flash attention, which enhances accuracy, but it requires careful CUDA setup. It’s a solid step forward, especially for complex detection tasks, though YOLOv11 remains faster for real-time needs. In short, choose YOLOv12 for accuracy and YOLOv11 for speed.”
Linkedin Post – Is YOLOv12 really a state-of-the-art model? ?
Muhammad Rizwan, recently tested YOLOv11 and YOLOv12 side by side to break down their real-world performance. His findings highlight the trade-offs between the two models:
- Frames Per Second (FPS): YOLOv11 maintains an average of 40 FPS, while YOLOv12 lags behind at 30 FPS. This makes YOLOv11 the better choice for real-time applications where speed is critical, such as traffic monitoring or live video feeds.
- Training Time: YOLOv12 takes about 20% longer to train than YOLOv11. On a small dataset with 130 training images and 43 validation images, YOLOv11 completed training in 0.009 hours, while YOLOv12 needed 0.011 hours. While this might seem minor for small datasets, the difference becomes significant for larger-scale projects.
- Accuracy: Both models achieved similar accuracy after fine-tuning for 10 epochs on the same dataset. YOLOv12 didn’t dramatically outperform YOLOv11 in terms of accuracy, suggesting the newer model’s improvements lie more in architectural enhancements than raw detection precision.
- Flash Attention: YOLOv12 introduces flash attention, a powerful mechanism that speeds up and optimizes attention layers. However, there’s a catch — this feature isn’t natively supported on the CPU, and enabling it with CUDA requires careful version-specific setup. For teams without powerful GPUs or those working on edge devices, this can become a roadblock.
The PC specifications used for testing:
- GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3050
- CPU: Intel Core-i5-10400 @2.90GHz
- RAM: 64 GB
The model specifications:
- Model = YOLO11n.pt and YOLOv12n.pt
- Image size = 640 for inference
Conclusion
YOLO v12 marks a significant leap forward in real-time object detection, combining CNN speed with Transformer-like attention mechanisms. With improved accuracy, lower computational costs, and a range of model variants, YOLO v12 is poised to redefine the landscape of real-time vision applications. Whether for autonomous vehicles, security surveillance, or medical imaging, YOLO v12 sets a new standard for real-time object detection efficiency.
What’s Next?
- YOLO v13 Possibilities: Will future versions push the attention mechanisms even further?
- Edge Device Optimization: Can Flash Attention or Area Attention be optimized for lower-power devices?
To help you better understand the differences, I’ve attached some code snippets and output results in the comparison section. These examples illustrate how both YOLOv11 and YOLOv12 perform in real-world scenarios, from object counting to speed estimation and heatmaps. I’m excited to see how you guys perceive this new release! Are the improvements in accuracy and attention mechanisms enough to justify the trade-offs in speed? Or do you think YOLOv11 still holds its ground for most applications?
以上是如何使用Yolo V12进行对象检测?的详细内容。更多信息请关注PHP中文网其他相关文章!

用Microsoft Power BI图来利用数据可视化的功能 在当今数据驱动的世界中,有效地将复杂信息传达给非技术观众至关重要。 数据可视化桥接此差距,转换原始数据i

专家系统:深入研究AI的决策能力 想象一下,从医疗诊断到财务计划,都可以访问任何事情的专家建议。 这就是人工智能专家系统的力量。 这些系统模仿Pro

首先,很明显,这种情况正在迅速发生。各种公司都在谈论AI目前撰写的代码的比例,并且这些代码的比例正在迅速地增加。已经有很多工作流离失所

从数字营销到社交媒体的所有创意领域,电影业都站在技术十字路口。随着人工智能开始重塑视觉讲故事的各个方面并改变娱乐的景观

ISRO的免费AI/ML在线课程:通向地理空间技术创新的门户 印度太空研究组织(ISRO)通过其印度遥感研究所(IIR)为学生和专业人士提供了绝佳的机会

本地搜索算法:综合指南 规划大规模活动需要有效的工作量分布。 当传统方法失败时,本地搜索算法提供了强大的解决方案。 本文探讨了爬山和模拟

该版本包括三种不同的型号,GPT-4.1,GPT-4.1 MINI和GPT-4.1 NANO,标志着向大语言模型景观内的特定任务优化迈进。这些模型并未立即替换诸如

Chip Giant Nvidia周一表示,它将开始制造AI超级计算机(可以处理大量数据并运行复杂算法的机器),完全是在美国首次在美国境内。这一消息是在特朗普总统SI之后发布的


热AI工具

Undresser.AI Undress
人工智能驱动的应用程序,用于创建逼真的裸体照片

AI Clothes Remover
用于从照片中去除衣服的在线人工智能工具。

Undress AI Tool
免费脱衣服图片

Clothoff.io
AI脱衣机

AI Hentai Generator
免费生成ai无尽的。

热门文章

热工具

mPDF
mPDF是一个PHP库,可以从UTF-8编码的HTML生成PDF文件。原作者Ian Back编写mPDF以从他的网站上“即时”输出PDF文件,并处理不同的语言。与原始脚本如HTML2FPDF相比,它的速度较慢,并且在使用Unicode字体时生成的文件较大,但支持CSS样式等,并进行了大量增强。支持几乎所有语言,包括RTL(阿拉伯语和希伯来语)和CJK(中日韩)。支持嵌套的块级元素(如P、DIV),

螳螂BT
Mantis是一个易于部署的基于Web的缺陷跟踪工具,用于帮助产品缺陷跟踪。它需要PHP、MySQL和一个Web服务器。请查看我们的演示和托管服务。

安全考试浏览器
Safe Exam Browser是一个安全的浏览器环境,用于安全地进行在线考试。该软件将任何计算机变成一个安全的工作站。它控制对任何实用工具的访问,并防止学生使用未经授权的资源。

Dreamweaver Mac版
视觉化网页开发工具

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
功能强大的PHP集成开发环境