Performance gap between redis and mysql

The performance differences between Redis and MySQL are obvious: 1. Reading performance: Redis memory storage, fast reading speed, MySQL disk storage, reading is limited by disk I/O. 2. Write performance: MySQL transaction model ensures data consistency, and write performance is usually better. Redis asynchronous writes can cause data loss. 3. Concurrency: Redis single-threaded architecture and event loop, high concurrency processing capabilities, MySQL multi-threaded architecture, concurrency is affected by the number of connections. 4. Data modeling: The Redis key-value data model is suitable for simple key/value pair storage, and MySQL has rich data modeling functions and supports relationships and constraints. 5. Scalability: Redis sharding and replication are easy to expand, MySQL cluster and

The performance gap between Redis and MySQL

Redis and MySQL are two different databases, optimized for different use cases. Therefore, there is a significant difference in performance.

Main Performance Gap

• Read Performance: Redis is known for its lightning-fast read speeds as it transfers data stored in memory. MySQL is a disk-based database, and read performance is limited by disk I/O.
• Write performance: MySQL generally performs better in write-intensive operations because it uses an ACID transaction model to ensure data consistency. Redis provides asynchronous writing, which may cause data loss.
• Concurrency: Redis is ideal for handling high concurrent requests because it adopts a single-threaded architecture and uses an event loop to handle requests. MySQL uses a multi-threaded architecture, but as the number of connections increases, concurrency may be affected.
• Data modeling: Redis provides a flexible key-value data model, which is ideal for storing simple key/value pairs. MySQL provides richer data modeling capabilities, including relationships and constraints.
• Scalability: Redis can be easily scaled through sharding and replication to meet high load demands. MySQL is slightly less scalable and requires more complex clustering and sharding solutions.

Use Cases

Redis is best suited for applications that require high read throughput, high concurrency, and low latency. For example:

• Cache
• Session Storage
• Ranking

MySQL is best suited for those who require transactional consistency, complex data modeling and High write throughput applications. For example:

• CRM system
• E-commerce platform
• Financial application

The above is the detailed content of Performance gap between redis and mysql. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!