What is the difference between the architecture of the Spring WebFlux framework and traditional Spring MVC?

The key difference between Spring WebFlux and Spring MVC is reactive programming (asynchronous processing) and blocking I/O model. This difference leads to key architectural differences: asynchronous processing and event loop models; handlers based on functional interfaces; asynchronous response streams (Publisher objects); simplified exception handling mechanisms; higher throughput and scalability.

The difference between Spring WebFlux framework architecture and traditional Spring MVC

Spring WebFlux is a framework based on reactive programming, while traditional The Spring MVC framework is based on the blocking I/O model. This fundamental difference leads to key architectural and conceptual differences between the two.

1. Synchronous vs. asynchronous processing

• Spring MVC: Adopts synchronous processing model, which means that the request is processed after Previously the thread would be blocked.
• Spring WebFlux: Adopts an asynchronous processing model, allowing multiple requests to be processed concurrently, thereby improving throughput and low latency.

2. Threading model

• Spring MVC: Use the thread pool to process requests, you may encounter thread starvation Dead and deadlock problems.
• Spring WebFlux: Based on event loop and non-blocking I/O, it avoids thread starvation and deadlock, and provides higher scalability and concurrency.

3. Handler type

• Spring MVC: Use Controller handlers, which are class-based , needs to be instantiated before the request is processed.
• Spring WebFlux: Use HandlerFunction handlers, which are functional interfaces and can be created dynamically, thus saving overhead.

4. Responsive streaming

• Spring MVC: Returns a ServletResponse object, representing a synchronous response.
• Spring WebFlux: Returns a Publisher object that represents an asynchronous response stream, allowing for progressive and non-blocking delivery of data.

5. Exception handling

• Spring MVC: Use ControllerAdvice and ExceptionHandler annotations to handle exceptions, which may cause complications and difficult to debug code.
• Spring WebFlux: Provides a unified exception handling mechanism, using ErrorHandler and WebFilterChain to handle errors, simplifying exception handling.

Practical case: Building a Spring WebFlux responsive application

@RestController
public class ExampleController {

    @PostMapping("/reactive")
    public Flux<String> reactiveEndpoint(@RequestBody Flux<String> requestBody) {
        return requestBody.map(s -> s.toUpperCase());
    }
}

Conclusion:

Spring WebFlux framework Based on reactive programming, it provides higher throughput, better scalability, and simpler exception handling, making it ideal for building modern high-performance web applications.

The above is the detailed content of What is the difference between the architecture of the Spring WebFlux framework and traditional Spring MVC?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!