When developing software, we often encounter situations where we need to simulate database connections for testing. However, sometimes we may not have a tool like sqlmock to help us achieve this goal. So, how should we simulate the ping operation of the database without sqlmock? In this article, PHP editor Youzi will introduce you to a simple and effective method to achieve this goal, allowing you to successfully conduct simulation tests of database connections.
Question content
I would like to understand how to use mock.mock
to refactor my code to simulate db.ping()
. I want to understand this concept without a framework first.
This is the code I want to test:
func Connect() (*sql.DB, error) { db, err := sql.Open("mysql", "root:secret@tcp(s-maria-db)/s_db") if err != nil { return nil, err } for i := 0; i < 60; i++ { // I am hoping to mock this portion if err := db.Ping(); err == nil { break } time.Sleep(time.Second) } return db, nil }
I tried this article on how to simulate a ping command, but that doesn't actually answer the question. If so, I don't understand the solution as it works for my code.
Workaround
You need to use a separate function for ping, and it needs to accept an interface so that you can conditionally pass in the real *sql.db
or simulation. This is because you cannot override methods on a structure.
// connect opens a connection to the database. func connect() (*sql.db, error) { return sql.open("mysql", "root:secret@tcp(s-maria-db)/s_db") } // pinger defines an interface for pinging. type pinger interface { ping() error } // ping attempts to ping the database, trying several times before failing. func ping(p pinger) error { const maxattempts = 60 var err error for i := 0; i < maxattempts; i++ { if err = p.ping(); err == nil { return nil } if i < maxattempts - 1 { time.sleep(time.second) } } return err }
func main() { if err := run(); err != nil { log.fatal(err) } } func run() error { db, err := connect() if err != nil { return fmt.errorf("connecting to db: %w", err) } defer db.close() if err = ping(db); err != nil { return fmt.errorf("pinging db: %w", err) } ... }
type mockDB struct { mock.Mock } func (m *mockDB) Ping() error { args := m.Called() return args.Error(0) } func TestPing(t *testing.T) { db := &mockDB{} db.On("Ping").Return(...) err := Ping(db) ... db.AssertExpectations(t) }
The above is the detailed content of How to simulate db ping without sqlmock. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor