search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangUnmarshalling dynamodb projects returns the same project

解组 dynamodb 项目返回相同的项目

php editor Zimo will introduce to you today how to solve the problem of ungrouping DynamoDB items and returning the same items. DynamoDB is a high-performance, serverless key-value database, but sometimes it may return the same items when querying them, which can be a tricky problem for developers. Don't worry, we'll provide you with a solution to ensure your query results are unique and correct. In this article, we will explain the cause of the problem in detail and provide a simple and effective way to solve it. Let’s take a look!

Question content

I have a range loop in golang that loops through the mapping of type.attributevalues returned by dynamodb using a scan function.

I'm looping through this map using the built-in function provided by the golang aws-sdk-v2 package attributevalue.unmarshalmap() and what happens is that I get back items that are the same length as the slice.

Code:

type users struct {
    user *string `dynamodbav:"user"` 
    email *string `dynamodbav:"email"` 
    }

    user := users{}
  
   for _ , dbitem := range dynamoresults.items { 
    err = attributevalue.unmarshalmap(dbitem, &user)
   }

// gives the same pointer location for all 
users[0].user 
users[1].user
users[2].user

I also tried appending the user to the slice in the results

// this just gives a slice with the same items as above
 u := []Users{}
for _ , dbItem := range dynamoResults.Items { 
        err = attributevalue.UnmarshalMap(dbItem, &Users)
        u = append(u, Users)
       }

The solution I found using attributevalue.unmarshallistofmaps() is to simply provide the function with a slice of items from dynamodb.

My question is actually to understand why using the above two solutions doesn't work as expected, doesn't it loop through the dynamodb items and pass them individually to the unmarshal function? It seems like just keep doing the same thing.

Solution

If we change the problem slightly - from dynamo db unmarshalling to json unmarshalling - then we can go playground. In the sample code, I see two factors working together to cause duplicate slice values:

  1. The unmarshalling target is defined outside the loop (line 51), so when unmarshalling u1out, the result is written to the same location on each loop iteration (line 54) .

  2. The field of type
  3. user1 is *string, so when the loop variable value is copied to the slice (line 55), user and email The string pointed to will not be copied. Only their pointer values ​​are copied.

Putting these two together, each iteration will write the unmarshaled user and email values ​​to the same memory location. This is demonstrated by the first two lines of output, which print the elements of u1out.

The remaining lines of output show the results in three other cases: when the target variable is moved within the loop (u1in and u2in) or when the field is changed to string(u2out). In each case, new locations for ungrouped values ​​are created as expected, and duplicates are not printed.

package main

import (
    "encoding/json"
    "fmt"
)

type (
    Users1 struct {
        User  *string
        Email *string
    }
    Users2 struct {
        User  string
        Email string
    }
)

func main() {
    dbItems := []string{
        `{"User":"userA","Email":"<a href="https://www.php.cn/link/89fee0513b6668e555959f5dc23238e9" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7d2d4c2d5e6e7c2dfc6cad7cbc289c4c8ca">[email&#160;protected]</a>"}`,
        `{"User":"userB","Email":"<a href="https://www.php.cn/link/89fee0513b6668e555959f5dc23238e9" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a2f293f28181a3f223b372a363f74393537">[email&#160;protected]</a>"}`,
    }

    u1Out := withVarDeclaredOutsideLoop[Users1](dbItems)
    printUsers(u1Out)

    u1In := withVarDeclaredInsideLoop[Users1](dbItems)
    printUsers(u1In)

    u2Out := withVarDeclaredOutsideLoop[Users2](dbItems)
    printUsers(u2Out)

    u2In := withVarDeclaredInsideLoop[Users2](dbItems)
    printUsers(u2In)

    // Output
    // u[0] = {User:0xc000014130 Email:0xc000014140}
    // u[1] = {User:0xc000014130 Email:0xc000014140}
    // u[0] = {User:0xc0000141c0 Email:0xc0000141d0}
    // u[1] = {User:0xc000014210 Email:0xc000014220}
    // u[0] = {User:userA Email:<a href="https://www.php.cn/link/89fee0513b6668e555959f5dc23238e9" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86f3f5e3f4c7c6e3fee7ebf6eae3a8e5e9eb">[email&#160;protected]</a>}
    // u[1] = {User:userB Email:<a href="https://www.php.cn/link/89fee0513b6668e555959f5dc23238e9" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07727462754547627f666a776b622964686a">[email&#160;protected]</a>}
    // u[0] = {User:userA Email:<a href="https://www.php.cn/link/89fee0513b6668e555959f5dc23238e9" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98edebfdead9d8fde0f9f5e8f4fdb6fbf7f5">[email&#160;protected]</a>}
    // u[1] = {User:userB Email:<a href="https://www.php.cn/link/89fee0513b6668e555959f5dc23238e9" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe8b8d9b8cbcbe9b869f938e929bd09d9193">[email&#160;protected]</a>}
}

func withVarDeclaredOutsideLoop[T any](dbItems []string) []T {
    var t T
    u := []T{}
    for _, dbItem := range dbItems {
        json.Unmarshal([]byte(dbItem), &t)
        u = append(u, t)
    }
    return u
}

func withVarDeclaredInsideLoop[T any](dbItems []string) []T {
    u := []T{}
    for _, dbItem := range dbItems {
        var t T
        json.Unmarshal([]byte(dbItem), &t)
        u = append(u, t)
    }
    return u
}

func printUsers[T any](u []T) {
    for i, user := range u {
        fmt.Printf("u[%d] = %+v\n", i, user)
    }
}

The above is the detailed content of Unmarshalling dynamodb projects returns the same project. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:stackoverflow. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
Golang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsGolang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsApr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedGolang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedApr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Why Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedWhy Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedApr 21, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed ComparisonGolang vs. C : Performance and Speed ComparisonApr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Is Golang Faster Than C  ? Exploring the LimitsIs Golang Faster Than C ? Exploring the LimitsApr 20, 2025 am 12:19 AM

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingGolang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang vs. C  : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceGolang vs. C : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisGolang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisApr 20, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version

PhpStorm Mac version

The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

SecLists

SecLists

SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.