search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangClose goroutines faster using channels

使用通道更快地关闭 goroutine

Question content

I am new to GO and I have a question about stopping a goroutine using a channel signal.

I have a long running goroutine (over 1000 of them) and a manager to manage it:

func myThreadFunc(stop chan bool) {
    for {
        select {
        case <- stop:
            log.Debug("Stopping thread")
            return
        default:
            callClientTask() 
        }
    }
}

func callClientTask() {
    // This can take long time up to 30 seconds - this is external HTTP API call
    time.Sleep(5 * time.Second)
}


func manager() {
    var cancelChannelSlice []chan bool
    for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
        cancelChannel := make(chan bool)
        cancelChannelSlice = append(cancelChannelSlice, cancelChannel)

        go myThreadFunc(cancelChannel)
    }

    var stopTest = func() {
        for _, c := range cancelChannelSlice {
            c <- true
        }
    }

    timeout := time.After(time.Duration(300) * time.Second)
    for {
        select {
        case <-timeout:
            stopTest()
        default:
            time.Sleep(time.Second)
        }
    }
}

In this case, every time I call c the manager waits for <code>callClientTask() to complete before moving on to the next cancelChannel I want all goroutines to stop in 1 iteration of callClientTask() (no more than 30 seconds)

The only way I tried was to cast the new goroutine like this:

var stopTest = func() {
        for _, c := range cancelChannelSlice {
            go func(c chan bool) {
                c <- true
                close(c)
            }(c)
        }
    }

Am I doing this the right way?


Correct answer


As far as I understand from your question, "You want all goroutines to stop within 1 iteration of callClientTask() (no more than 30 seconds )" and the worker threads run simultaneously without synchronization issues.

I reorganized the code to run concurrently with the wait group.

Sample code:

package main

import (
    "log"
    "sync"
    "time"
)

func worker(stop <-chan struct{}, wg *sync.WaitGroup) {
    defer wg.Done()

    for {
        select {
        case <-stop:
            log.Println("Stopping thread")
            return
        default:
            callClientTask()
        }
    }
}

func callClientTask() {
    time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) // simulate a long-running task (for testing purposes)
}

func main() {
    var wg sync.WaitGroup
    stop := make(chan struct{})

    for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
        wg.Add(1)
        go worker(stop, &wg)
    }

    time.Sleep(5 * time.Second) // allow workers to run for a while
    close(stop)                 // stop all workers, close channel
    wg.Wait()                   // wait for all workers
}

Output:

2023/10/26 10:40:44 Stopping thread
2023/10/26 10:40:44 Stopping thread
....
2023/10/26 10:40:49 Stopping thread
2023/10/26 10:40:49 Stopping thread

edit:

If you want to stop some workers, you must update the workers. The following code includes a worker with "stop" and "stop" channels and a start/stop function.

Sample code:

package main

import (
    "log"
    "sync"
    "time"
)

type Worker struct {
    stop    chan struct{}
    stopped chan struct{}
}

func NewWorker() *Worker {
    return &Worker{
        stop:    make(chan struct{}),
        stopped: make(chan struct{}),
    }
}

func (w *Worker) Start(wg *sync.WaitGroup) {
    wg.Add(1)
    go func() {
        defer wg.Done()
        for {
            select {
            case <-w.stop:
                log.Println("Stopping thread")
                close(w.stopped)
                return
            default:
                callClientTask()
            }
        }
    }()
}

func (w *Worker) Stop() {
    close(w.stop)
    <-w.stopped
}

func callClientTask() {
    time.Sleep(2 * time.Second) // simulate a long-running task (for testing purposes)
}

func main() {
    var wg sync.WaitGroup
    workers := make([]*Worker, 1000)

    for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
        workers[i] = NewWorker()
        workers[i].Start(&wg)
    }

    time.Sleep(5 * time.Second) // allow workers to run for a while 
    for i := 0; i < 100; i++ { // stop  first 100 workers
        workers[i].Stop()
    }  
    for i := 100; i < 1000; i++ { // wait other workers to finish
        workers[i].Stop()
    }
    wg.Wait()
}

Output:

2023/10/26 12:51:26 Stopping thread
2023/10/26 12:51:28 Stopping thread
2023/10/26 12:51:30 Stopping thread
....

The above is the detailed content of Close goroutines faster using channels. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:stackoverflow. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
Golang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsGolang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsApr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedGolang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedApr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Why Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedWhy Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedApr 21, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed ComparisonGolang vs. C : Performance and Speed ComparisonApr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Is Golang Faster Than C  ? Exploring the LimitsIs Golang Faster Than C ? Exploring the LimitsApr 20, 2025 am 12:19 AM

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingGolang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang vs. C  : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceGolang vs. C : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisGolang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisApr 20, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version

PhpStorm Mac version

The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

Safe Exam Browser

Safe Exam Browser

Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor