I need to generate a complex xml file in order to load it into another system. Therefore, tags and tag order cannot be changed as they must follow a precise format to load correctly. I'm currently using the encoding/xml package in golang to try to accomplish this.
The problem I'm having is that I can't have two tags with the same name. I get the following error: main.XMLDict Field "Key1" with label "key" conflicts with field "Key2" with label "key". Below is my simplified code:
import ( "fmt" "encoding/xml" "os" ) type XMLDict struct { XMLName xml.Name `xml:"dict"` Key1 string `xml:"key"` Data1 string `xml:"data"` Key2 string `xml:"key"` StringArray XMLStringArray } type XMLStringArray struct { XMLName xml.Name `xml:"array"̀` XMLString []string `xml:"string"` } func main() { sa := make([]string, 3) sa[0] = "g" sa[1] = "h" sa[2] = "i" arr := XMLStringArray{ XMLString: sa, } master := XMLDict{ Key1: "Color", Data1: "Random data", Key2: "Curve", StringArray: arr, } output, err := xml.MarshalIndent(master, " ", " ") if err != nil { fmt.Printf("error: %v\n", err) } os.Stdout.Write(output) return }
Here is an example of the XML file I need to generate:
<dict> <key>Color</key> <data> BAtzdHJlYW10eXBlZIHoA4QBQISEhAdOU0NvbG9yAISECE5TT2Jq ZWN0AIWEAWMChARmZmZmg7oehT2DZmYmP4NmZiY/AYY= </data> <key>Curve</key> <dict> <key>Interpolation</key> <integer>5</integer> <key>Points</key> <array> <string>{0, 0}</string> <string>{0.05, 0.053871}</string> <string>{0.1, 0.110555}</string> <string>{0.15, 0.166793}</string> <string>{0.2, 0.216919}</string> <string>{0.3, 0.327703}</string> <string>{0.4, 0.440897}</string> <string>{0.5, 0.539322}</string> <string>{0.6, 0.657477}</string> <string>{0.7, 0.763339}</string> <string>{0.75, 0.814082}</string> <string>{0.8, 0.861097}</string> <string>{0.85, 0.904147}</string> <string>{0.9, 0.944079}</string> <string>{0.95, 0.974036}</string> <string>{0.98, 0.990085}</string> <string>{1, 1}</string> </array> </dict> <key>Line Width</key> <real>0.0040000001899898052</real> <key>Points Diameter</key> <real>0.014999999664723873</real> <key>Precision</key> <real>9.9999997473787516e-05</real> </dict>
So, my questions: 1) Is there an easy way to solve this problem, still using the structural approach of building the data and then generating the XML, 2) Is there a better way to build and generate this file than using Stuts or 3) Am I just doing something wrong?
EDIT: Below is the requested input file:
"File created by Curve" LGOROWLENGTH 3 # # Curve4 Run Information # # Run: Run 1 - Calibration # Based On: <none> # # Values in this file are 'Wanted' # # Gray Balance: On # reduced after 100% # until 100% # media white values: Measured # media aim points: -0.17 / 0.96 # NUMBER_OF_FIELDS 6 BEGIN_DATA_FORMAT SampleID SAMPLE_NAME CMYK_C CMYK_M CMYK_Y CMYK_K END_DATA_FORMAT NUMBER_OF_SETS 17 BEGIN_DATA A0 "0.00" 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A1 "5.00" 5.3871 5.1408 5.2761 5.5775 A2 "10.00" 11.0555 10.7418 10.6026 11.0702 A3 "15.00" 16.6793 16.3894 15.8763 16.7064 A4 "20.00" 21.6919 21.7968 21.0234 22.3956 A5 "30.00" 32.7703 32.7458 31.1841 33.6738 A6 "40.00" 44.0897 42.4801 40.0887 44.2966 A7 "50.00" 53.9322 54.2364 49.1680 54.8968 A8 "60.00" 65.7477 64.9423 59.1719 66.4696 A9 "70.00" 76.3339 75.4398 69.4943 77.1661 A10 "75.00" 81.4082 80.5957 75.1423 82.0637 A11 "80.00" 86.1097 84.9296 81.1298 86.7399 A12 "85.00" 90.4147 88.8039 86.7945 90.8142 A13 "90.00" 94.4079 92.6783 92.1110 94.2426 A14 "95.00" 97.4036 96.2097 96.6019 97.2088 A15 "98.00" 99.0085 98.5775 98.7747 98.9000 A16 "100.00" 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 END_DATA
Correct answer
I think there are many solutions to achieve this using XML custom marshaler; this is my attempt.
First of all, in your root <dict></dict>
it always seems to be a "list" of items like this:
<key>a-string</key> <data|integer|real|array|dict>a-value</data|integer|real|array|dict> <key>another-string</key> <data|integer|real|array|dict>another-value</data|integer|real|array|dict>
To represent each of these, we can define a KeyValue
structure, where Value
is just an interface to represent anything it can hold (data
, integer
,...)
type KeyValue struct { Key string Value Value } type Value interface { getXMLName() string // this will return data, integer, array, etc, depending on the implementation }
We can then implement Value
using the different types provided in the example:
type ValueData struct { Data string `xml:",chardata"` } func (v ValueData) getXMLName() string { return "data" } type ValueInteger struct { Integer int `xml:",chardata"` } func (v ValueInteger) getXMLName() string { return "integer" } type ValueStringArray struct { Array []string `xml:"string"` } func (v ValueStringArray) getXMLName() string { return "array" } type ValueReal struct { Real float64 `xml:",chardata"` } func (v ValueReal) getXMLName() string { return "real" }
Within the XML tag, chardata
is used to avoid including extra levels in our XML document; for ValueStringArray
, we use string
because your The project is named this way.
Finally, to allow recursion (dict
internal dict
), we can also define this structure:
type ValueDict struct { XMLName xml.Name `xml:"dict"` KeysValues []KeyValue } func (v ValueDict) getXMLName() string { return "dict" }
After completing all operations, we can implement a custom marshaler:
func (kv KeyValue) MarshalXML(e *xml.Encoder, _ xml.StartElement) error { if err := e.EncodeElement(kv.Key, xml.StartElement{Name: xml.Name{Local: "key"}}); err != nil { return err } if err := e.EncodeElement(kv.Value, xml.StartElement{Name: xml.Name{Local: kv.Value.getXMLName()}}); err != nil { return err } return nil }
This will allow the generation of projects like this:
<key>Line Width</key> <real>0.004000000189989805</real>The name of the
tag (here real
) is based on what is returned by the getXMLName()
method.
Finally, you can define Go structs and marshals like this:
master := ValueDict{ KeysValues: []KeyValue{ { Key: "Color", Value: ValueData{ Data: "BAtzdHJlYW10eXBlZIHoA4QBQISEhAdOU0NvbG9yAISECE5TT2JqZWN0AIWEAWMChARmZmZmg7oehT2DZmYmP4NmZiY/AYY=", }, }, { Key: "Curve", Value: ValueDict{ KeysValues: []KeyValue{ { Key: "Interpolation", Value: ValueInteger{ Integer: 5, }, }, { Key: "Points", Value: ValueStringArray{ Array: []string{ "{0, 0}", "{0.05, 0.053871}", "{0.1, 0.110555}", "{0.15, 0.166793}", "{0.2, 0.216919}", "{0.3, 0.327703}", "{0.4, 0.440897}", "{0.5, 0.539322}", "{0.6, 0.657477}", "{0.7, 0.763339}", "{0.75, 0.814082}", "{0.8, 0.861097}", "{0.85, 0.904147}", "{0.9, 0.944079}", "{0.95, 0.974036}", "{0.98, 0.990085}", "{1, 1}", }, }, }, }, }, }, { Key: "Line Width", Value: ValueReal{ Real: 0.0040000001899898052, }, }, { Key: "Points Diameter", Value: ValueReal{ Real: 0.014999999664723873, }, }, { Key: "Precision", Value: ValueReal{ Real: 9.9999997473787516e-05, }, }, }, } output, err := xml.MarshalIndent(master, " ", " ") if err != nil { fmt.Printf("error: %v\n", err) } os.Stdout.Write(output)
This will print exactly what is in the sample XML provided in your question.
You can test the complete code in the Go Playground: https://go.dev/play/p /k8cEIywx3UB.
The main advantages of this solution are:
- We just need to implement a custom XML marshaler
- It can be easily extended if you have other structures in your XML document (let's say a boolean value, we can create a
ValueBool
implementationValue
)
The above is the detailed content of Golang xml key name conflict. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.