search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangEfficient concurrent programming: using Go WaitGroup and coroutine pools

高效并发编程:使用Go WaitGroup和协程池

Efficient concurrent programming: using Go WaitGroup and coroutine pool

Introduction:
In modern computer systems, concurrent programming is becoming more and more important. Concurrent programming can maximize the use of multi-core processor performance and improve program execution efficiency. However, concurrent programming also faces challenges, such as dealing with synchronization and management of concurrent tasks. In this article, we will introduce how to use WaitGroup and coroutine pool in Go language to achieve efficient concurrent programming, and provide specific code examples.

1. Use of WaitGroup:
Go language provides a very useful WaitGroup type, which can be used to wait for a group of coroutines to complete execution. The following is a simple example that shows how to use WaitGroup to achieve synchronization of concurrent tasks:

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "sync"
)

func worker(id int, wg *sync.WaitGroup) {
    defer wg.Done()

    fmt.Printf("Worker %d starting
", id)

    // 模拟耗时的任务
    for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
        fmt.Printf("Worker %d: %d
", id, i)
    }

    fmt.Printf("Worker %d done
", id)
}

func main() {
    var wg sync.WaitGroup

    // 启动5个协程
    for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
        wg.Add(1)
        go worker(i, &wg)
    }

    // 等待所有协程执行完毕
    wg.Wait()
}

In the above code, we define a worker function to simulate time-consuming tasks. We notify the WaitGroup that the task has been completed by passing in a pointer to the WaitGroup. In the main function, we started 5 coroutines and notified WaitGroup to increase the number of waiting tasks by calling the wg.Add(1) method. Finally, we call the wg.Wait() method to block the main coroutine until all tasks are completed.

2. Use of coroutine pool:
Go language also provides the implementation of coroutine pool, which is used to limit the number of concurrency and prevent too many coroutines from running at the same time. The coroutine pool can help us balance system resources and avoid resource waste. Here is an example that shows how to use a coroutine pool to perform tasks:

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "sync"
)

type Pool struct {
    workers chan struct{}
    wg      sync.WaitGroup
}

func NewPool(size int) *Pool {
    return &Pool{
        workers: make(chan struct{}, size),
    }
}

func (p *Pool) AddTask(task func()) {
    p.workers <- struct{}{}
    p.wg.Add(1)

    go func() {
        task()
        <-p.workers
        p.wg.Done()
    }()
}

func (p *Pool) Wait() {
    p.wg.Wait()
}

func main() {
    pool := NewPool(3)

    // 添加10个任务到协程池
    for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
        taskID := i
        pool.AddTask(func() {
            fmt.Printf("Task %d is running
", taskID)
        })
    }

    // 等待所有任务完成
    pool.Wait()
}

In the above code, we define a Pool structure that contains a workers channel for limiting the number of coroutines and a WaitGroup is used to wait for all tasks to complete. We write an empty structure into the channel by calling p.workers , indicating that a coroutine is executing the task; by calling <code> Take out an empty structure from the channel, indicating that a coroutine has completed its task. In the AddTask method, we add the task to the coroutine pool and take out an empty structure from the channel after the task execution is completed. Finally, call the <code>pool.Wait() method to wait for all tasks to complete.

Conclusion:
By using WaitGroup and coroutine pool, we can easily achieve efficient concurrent programming. WaitGroup helps us synchronize the execution of concurrent tasks, while the coroutine pool limits the number of concurrencies and improves the utilization of system resources. In actual applications, we can adjust the size of the coroutine pool according to needs to make full use of the computer's performance.

The above is the detailed content of Efficient concurrent programming: using Go WaitGroup and coroutine pools. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Golang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsGolang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsApr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedGolang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedApr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Why Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedWhy Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedApr 21, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed ComparisonGolang vs. C : Performance and Speed ComparisonApr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Is Golang Faster Than C  ? Exploring the LimitsIs Golang Faster Than C ? Exploring the LimitsApr 20, 2025 am 12:19 AM

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingGolang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang vs. C  : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceGolang vs. C : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisGolang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisApr 20, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SecLists

SecLists

SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

Atom editor mac version download

Atom editor mac version download

The most popular open source editor

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

DVWA

DVWA

Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software