


Query the lower bound of K using the prefix and array update of the tree array
A primary sequence sum array is a collection that accumulates the sum of interleaved elements until a specific index is reached. This is a strategy widely used in combinatorial refactoring to optimize time complexity. Tree arrays, also known as Binary Index Trees (BITs), are a database form that efficiently updates elements and computes the sum of previous sequences in logarithmic time complexity.
In this article, we will discuss how to use a modern improvement of Fenwick Tree in C to reveal the smaller limit bound of a given value, called K, from a series summed array.
grammar
The syntax defines two functions, update and query, and a main function for the Fenwick tree, a data structure used for efficient range query and update operations. The update function accepts an index idx, a value val, the size of the array n, and the Fenwick tree array BIT. It updates the Fenwick tree by adding val to the node at index idx and all its ancestors. The query function accepts an index idx and Fenwick tree array BIT. It returns the cumulative sum from the root node to the node with index idx. The main function declares the size n of the array, the prefix and array arr, and the Fenwick tree array BIT initialized to 0.
void update(int idx, int val, int n, int BIT[]) { while (idx <= n) { BIT[idx] += val; idx += (idx & -idx); } } int query(int idx, int BIT[]) { int sum = 0; while (idx > 0) { sum += BIT[idx]; idx -= (idx & -idx); } return sum; } // Driver code int main() { int n; int arr[n+1]; int BIT[n+1] = {0}; return 0; }
algorithm
To determine the minimum value of K in the prefix and array with Fenwick tree update, follow the following complex steps -
Instantiate a Fenwick tree (BIT) of size n 1, initializing all elements to 0.
Use the update() function to modify the Fenwick Tree with the given prefix and array.
Perform a query on the Fenwick tree to determine the lower bound of K. Iterate starting from the most significant bit in the binary representation of n to the least significant bit. Use the query() function to verify whether the current prefix sum is less than or equal to K. If this condition is met, the current prefix sum is subtracted from K and the index is updated to move to the next bit. If the condition is not met, move to the next bit without updating the index.
After all bits have been traversed, the index will represent the prefix and the lower bound of K in the array.
Output the obtained index as the lower bound of K.
method
Method 1 − Perform binary search on Fenwick tree. In this method, we perform a binary search on the Fenwick tree to find the lower bound of K.
Method 2 - Binary search with delayed propagation on Fenwick tree.
method 1
To solve this problem, we first set the left and right pointers to 1 and n respectively (indicating the size of the prefix and array), and then use a binary search strategy to determine the index corresponding to the largest prefix sum less than or equal to K i. Then, depending on whether the value of prefix sum [i] is less than or equal to K, the position of the left pointer or the right pointer is updated.
Example
The basic mechanism of this code is to utilize a data structure called Fenwick Tree (also known as Binary Indexed Tree). Its purpose is to determine the lower bound of the specified value 'k' in the prefix sum array. This is accomplished by constructing a Fenwick Tree using an update function that merges the prefix and value of each element in the array into the corresponding position in the Fenwick Tree.
The findLowerBound function then uses a binary search algorithm to find the lower bound of "k" in the prefix and array by querying the function. This function calculates the cumulative sum of values up to the current index in the Fenwick tree. Eventually, the code ends up identifying the prefix and the index of the lower bound of "k" in the array, and displays the result to the console.
#include <iostream> using namespace std; void update(int i, int v, int n, int b[]) { while (i <= n) { b[i] += v; i += (i & -i); } } int query(int i, int b[]) { int s = 0; while (i > 0) { s += b[i]; i -= (i & -i); } return s; } int findLowerBound(int k, int n, int p[], int b[]) { int l = 1, r = n, idx = 0; while (l <= r) { int m = (l + r) / 2; int msum = query(m, b); if (msum <= k) { idx = m; l = m + 1; } else { r = m - 1; } } return idx; } int main() { int n = 5; int p[] = {0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15}; int b[n + 1] = {0}; for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { update(i, p[i], n, b); } int k = 10, idx; idx = findLowerBound(k, n, p, b); cout << "The lower bound of " << k << " is at index " << idx << " in the prefix sum array." << endl; return 0; }
Output
The lower bound of 10 is at index 3 in the prefix sum array.
Method 2
To further optimize Fenwick trees, a technique called lazy propagation can be used. This approach entails deferring updates to the Fenwick Tree until they are actually needed, thereby reducing the number of updates and making the query process more efficient.
Example
The code provides a solution for locating the lower bound of a given value K in a prefix sum array. A prefix sum array is an array where each element is the sum of the elements from index 0 to that index in the original array. The lower bound is the first index in the prefix sum array such that the sum of the elements up to that index equals or exceeds K. The solution uses Fenwick tree data structure and delay propagation technique to enhance the efficiency of the solution. The code includes functions for modifying Fenwick trees, calculating prefix sums, and finding lower bounds. The code also initializes prefix sum arrays, Fenwick trees, and delayed propagation arrays. Finally, it outputs the prefix and the lower bound of K in the array.
#include <iostream> #include <cstring> using namespace std; void update(int idx, int val, int n, int ft[], int lz[]) { while (idx <= n) ft[idx] += val, idx += (idx & -idx); } int getPrefixSum(int idx, int ft[]) { int sum = 0; while (idx > 0) sum += ft[idx], idx -= (idx & -idx); return sum; } int findLowerBound(int K, int n, int ps[], int ft[], int lz[]) { int l = 1, r = n, lb = 0; while (l <= r) { int m = (l + r) / 2, s = getPrefixSum(m, ft) + lz[m]; if (s <= K) lb = m, l = m + 1; else r = m - 1; } return lb; } int main() { int n = 5; int ps[] = {0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15}; int ft[n + 1], lz[n + 1]; memset(ft, 0, sizeof(ft)); memset(lz, 0, sizeof(lz)); for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) update(i, ps[i] - ps[i - 1], n, ft, lz); int K = 10; int lb = findLowerBound(K, n, ps, ft, lz); cout << "For the given array with size " << n << " and prefix sum array ["; for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { cout << ps[i]; if (i < n) cout << ", "; } cout << "], the lower bound of " << K << " is at index " << lb << " in the prefix sum array." << endl; return 0; }
Output
For the given array with size 5 and prefix sum array [1, 3, 6, 10, 15], the lower bound of 10 is at index 4 in the prefix sum array.
in conclusion
A discussion on mining elusive K-value thresholds from carefully designed prefixes and arrays, enhanced by an update that takes advantage of the clever Fenwick tree algorithm from the world of C programming. Dive into the complexities of two efficient methods: binary search on Fenwick trees and binary search on Fenwick trees with lazy propagation. Carefully choose the most appropriate method based on the specific requirements and constraints of your particular problem. Hopefully this sheds light on the conceptualization and implementation of the elusive task of finding a lower bound on K from an array of prefix sums with updates, leveraging the unparalleled power of Fenwick trees in the C domain.
The above is the detailed content of Query the lower bound of K using the prefix and array update of the tree array. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools