


Query the number of connected components after removing a vertex from the tree
The following query can be used to determine the connected components remaining after removing tree vertices: First consider the tree structure. Then, each connected component is examined by moving through the tree using a breadth-first or depth-first search algorithm. Once the required vertices are evicted, the same traversal method is used to decide the number of connected components. The outcome will be determined based on the change in counts before and after expulsion. This method effectively monitors connection changes and helps in computing updates to connected components in the tree.
usage instructions
Depth First Search (DFS) Method
And check the method
Depth First Search (DFS) Method
In the DFS method, we first perform a DFS traversal from any selected node in the original tree to count the connected components after removing the vertices from the tree. During this traversal, we iterate through each connected node, mark each node as visited, and track the number of times DFS was used. We perform a new DFS traversal after deleting a specified vertex, ensuring that deleted vertices are skipped during the exploration phase. We can determine the number of connected components in the updated tree by comparing the number of calls to DFS before and after deletion. This method can efficiently count the number of connected elements while adjusting for changes in the tree structure.
algorithm
Select any vertex on the original tree as the starting point for DFS traversal.
Set the variable "count" to start counting connected components. First, set it to 0.
From the selected starting vertex, use DFS to traverse the tree.
Mark each vertex visited during the DFS traversal and increment the "count" by 1 for each new DFS call (i.e., for each connected component found).
After the DFS traversal is completed, the number of connected elements in the original tree will be represented by "count".
Delete the specified vertex from the tree.
Repeat the DFS traversal from the same starting vertex, making sure to avoid exploring deleted vertices.
When running DFS, update the "count" variable similarly to before.
The number of associated components in the upgraded tree will be determined by subtracting the post-evacuation "count" from the starting "count".
Example
#include <iostream> #include <vector> void dfs(const std::vector<std::vector<int>>& tree, int v, std::vector<bool>& visited, int& count) { visited[v] = true; count++; for (int u : tree[v]) { if (!visited[u]) { dfs(tree, u, visited, count); } } } int countConnectedComponents(const std::vector<std::vector<int>>& tree, int startVertex) { int n = tree.size(); std::vector<bool> visited(n, false); int count = 0; dfs(tree, startVertex, visited, count); return count; } int main() { std::vector<std::vector<int>> tree = { {1, 2}, {0, 3}, {0, 4}, {1}, {2} }; int startVertex = 0; std::cout << countConnectedComponents(tree, startVertex) << std::endl; return 0; }
Output
5
And check the method
We first initialize each vertex as a separate component in the union find method so that we can count the connected components after removing the vertex from the tree. To keep track of parts and connections in the original tree, we take and lookup data structures. We update and query the data structure to reflect the change in tree connectivity after deleting the specified vertex. Then count and check the number of different sets in the data structure. The resulting count represents the connectivity of the updated components of the tree. After removing vertices, the search method can efficiently calculate connected components and effectively handle structural changes in the tree.
algorithm
Create an array or data structure from scratch that represents each vertex as a different part of the tree. Initially, each vertex is its own parent vertex.
Use the AND lookup operation in the preprocessing step to determine the connected component count of the original tree.
Use the union data structure to combine the parts of each edge (u, v) in the tree that contain vertices u and v. The initial connectivity of the tree is established in this step.
Delete the specified vertex from the tree.
Apply the union lookup operation of the preprocessing step to the modified tree.
After deletion, calculate and check the number of different parent representatives in the data structure.
The result count represents the connectivity of the tree update component.
Example
#include <iostream> #include <vector> class UnionFind { public: UnionFind(int n) { parent.resize(n); for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) { parent[i] = i; } } int find(int u) { if (parent[u] != u) { parent[u] = find(parent[u]); } return parent[u]; } void unite(int u, int v) { int rootU = find(u); int rootV = find(v); if (rootU != rootV) { parent[rootU] = rootV; } } int countDistinctParentRepresentatives() { int n = parent.size(); std::vector<bool> distinct(n, false); for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) { distinct[find(i)] = true; } int count = 0; for (bool isDistinct : distinct) { if (isDistinct) { count++; } } return count; } private: std::vector<int> parent; }; int main() { int n = 5; UnionFind uf(n); uf.unite(0, 1); uf.unite(0, 2); uf.unite(2, 3); uf.unite(2, 4); std::cout << uf.countDistinctParentRepresentatives() << std::endl; return 0; }
Output
1
in conclusion
In summary, the provided method can efficiently count the number of connected parts in the tree after deleting a specific vertex. Connectivity changes in tree structures can be efficiently handled using depth-first search (DFS) methods and union search methods. The DFS method starts the traversal from the selected vertex, marks each node visited, and counts the connected components. The updated count is obtained by comparing the before and after traversal counts after deleting the vertex, and a new traversal is performed without including the deleted node.
The initial connected component count is determined using a union operation via the Union-Find method, which initializes each vertex as a separate component. Apply the same union operation after deleting the vertices and count the different parent representatives to get an updated count.
Both methods can provide useful insights into the connectivity of the tree after vertices have been removed, and are suitable for a variety of scenarios.
The above is the detailed content of Query the number of connected components after removing a vertex from the tree. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment