British media: Some people in Silicon Valley advocate AI too much and preach that 'learning is useless'

News on June 13, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence, Silicon Valley wants people to believe that human behavior is predictable and skills can be replaced by artificial intelligence. The author of the British media explained through his own work experience that although the number of positions that can replace humans is increasing, artificial intelligence still cannot truly understand the nature of human behavior.

The following is the compiled content:

From 2010 to 2020, I devoted most of my time and energy to the new media industry. But the insecurity of being repeatedly laid off ultimately defeated my interest. So I learned programming and moved into a safer "web development" position. Recent significant advances in artificial intelligence seem to make programming feel like a repetitive task and a waste of time. Many professionals believe that today's robots have mastered programming and can perform better than humans in many aspects.

Programming can be too cumbersome and daunting for non-experts: these "programming languages" are considered difficult to understand and have no obvious structural rules. But according to AI advocates, there are no longer any barriers to programming. Now simply ask the chatbot and it will instantly generate code, complete with comments.

People still notice a lot of mistakes made by artificial intelligence when interacting with various chatbots. Of course, it will also try to resolve these issues in repeated conversations with people. In this way, it is not difficult to imagine that in the near future, artificial intelligence will be able to understand user needs and easily complete solutions, and the role of developers will seem to be a thing of the past.

This makes it easy for people to fall into the fatalism that artificial intelligence will take away jobs. The people who most advocate AI technology are themselves the ones most eager to develop it, encouraging people to surrender to a new robot-dominated future where spending time learning skills, performing tasks, or gaining a deep understanding of anything may be considered obsolete. . To rephrase this: It’s incorrect to confuse the ability to do something quickly with the ability to fully understand the reasons behind it.

AI chatbots don’t break the basic rules of programming. They simply digest the vast amount of open source material available online. People can use chatbots to skip the knowledge-building stage, but in doing so, they will never understand what decisions the machine made on their behalf, why they were made, and whether those decisions were good enough. The bottom line is that there are other possible decisions.

What is unique about web design and development is the way it thinks laterally. There is rarely a single correct objective way to achieve a certain feature. Developers have to think about all the different situations users will encounter on the site, imagine how they will interact with the site, what they expect to get from it, and whether what you are offering will overload their phone, etc. Although a trained machine can collect all the information on the Internet, it will not think like an artificial intelligence developer.

As an experienced developer, programming knowledge and creativity are indispensable. While advances in artificial intelligence may impact my ability to earn money in some areas, they won’t make me feel like I’ve mastered a skill as simple as typing verbal commands into a dialog box.

However, there is a concerted effort across Silicon Valley to convince people that the human mind is predictable, replicable, and not that complex. They claim that art and related fields can be reduced to mathematical equations and keywords as they spend billions developing robots that can spot fakes and automatically generate a variety of images.

When asked about the possible uses of artificial intelligence, OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman made this prediction about the future of the entertainment industry in his eyes: "People are still concerned about " The final season of Game of Thrones was unsatisfying, but imagine if you could ask your artificial intelligence to create a new and different ending? Or even put yourself in it as the protagonist?"

Since Ancient Times People have been able to do this with their own minds ever since. This suggests a lack of originality among proponents of artificial intelligence, who urge us to imagine ourselves being creative. These people cannot imagine the kind of pleasure and satisfaction they get from creating art, nor can they imagine why anyone would prefer to create their own stories rather than outsource the entire process to a machine. They lacked the fundamental confidence in their ideas that they were unable to recreate Game of Thrones without the help of computers.

Squeezing every piece of art into a machine and then pointlessly reducing them to approximate midpoints does not represent true artistic expression. It might just be an improv technique, a fun novelty. While artificial intelligence can generate imitations, it cannot replicate the mindset, skills and willingness that humans have to create works of art.

Many people believe that creative work is valuable only if it can be profitable, and they like to promote the threat theory of artificial intelligence. But a machine has no capacity for self-expression, no impulse to communicate, and that is the most precious thing that humans can represent. (Chenchen)

The above is the detailed content of British media: Some people in Silicon Valley advocate AI too much and preach that 'learning is useless'. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!