


How to deal with asynchronous communication between services in microservice architecture?
With the development of Internet technology, the scale and complexity of various application systems are also increasing. The traditional monolithic application architecture is difficult to cope with the rapidly growing traffic and increasingly complex business logic. Therefore, microservice architecture has become the choice of many enterprises and developers.
Microservice architecture splits a single application into multiple independent services, and realizes interaction and communication between services through their respective API interfaces. This way of dividing the application into small services not only facilitates development and deployment, but also improves overall scalability and maintainability. However, the issue of asynchronous communication has become an important challenge in the microservice architecture. This article introduces how to deal with the issue of asynchronous communication between services in the microservice architecture.
1. Why asynchronous communication is needed
Under the microservice architecture, the communication methods between services are divided into two types: synchronous and asynchronous. Synchronous communication means that after the caller sends a request, it waits for the receiver to reply, and cannot continue to perform subsequent operations until the reply is received. Similar to the concept of synchronous and asynchronous requests in front-end JavaScript.
Asynchronous communication means that the caller can continue to perform subsequent operations after sending the request without waiting for a reply from the receiver. After the receiver receives the request, it processes it asynchronously through the message middleware and then replies to the caller. In the microservice architecture, because calls between services are very frequent, if all synchronous communication methods are used, it will cause a lot of blocking and affect system performance. Therefore, using asynchronous communication can better solve this problem.
2. Technical implementation of microservice asynchronous communication
In the microservice architecture, asynchronous communication can be implemented using technical means such as message queues. Commonly used message queues include RabbitMQ, Kafka, IonMQ, etc.
(1) Message Queue
Message queue is an asynchronous communication mechanism that can transfer messages from one service to another service, allowing services to be decoupled. A message queue is generally composed of a producer and a consumer. The producer is responsible for sending messages to the queue, while the consumer is responsible for reading messages from the queue and processing them.
In the microservice architecture, the message queue can act as a "transfer station" between services, passing messages from one service to another to achieve the effect of asynchronous communication. For example, the order creation message in the order service can be passed to the warehousing service through the message queue, allowing it to perform inventory change operations.
(2) Event Sourcing
Event sourcing is an event-driven development model that records and stores all event states of the application for backtracking and querying at any time. Event sourcing allows developers to understand all behaviors of the application and facilitate debugging and repairing the system.
In a microservice architecture, event sourcing can be used for asynchronous communication. When a service sends a message, the receiver will record it for future reference. This approach can help developers better handle out-of-order and timeout issues between services.
3. The practice of microservice asynchronous communication
When dealing with asynchronous communication issues in microservice architecture, you need to pay attention to the following points.
(1) Avoid blocking when sending messages
When a service sends a message to the message queue, it cannot use synchronous calling, otherwise the sender will block here waiting for the receiver's response. , thereby affecting the performance of the entire system. Therefore, the sender of asynchronous communication should minimize the impact of sending messages and ensure that the service can continue to run after the message is sent.
(2) Ensure the reliability of messages
Because messages are uncontrollable in asynchronous communication systems, issues such as message loss, out-of-order, and repeated sending need to be dealt with. For example, the message queue's retry mechanism can be used to ensure the reliability of message delivery. In addition, some message queues also support multiple transmission protocols, such as reliable TCP, and may also use custom protocols to implement multiple copies to replicate and synchronize data.
(3) Choose the appropriate message queue
Different message queues have different throughput, response time, message durability and other characteristics. When choosing a message queue, you need to make a choice based on actual business needs. For example, when you need to achieve high reliability of message delivery, you can choose to use RabbitMQ message queue, and when you need to ensure high throughput of message delivery, you can choose to use Kafka.
(4) Avoid using distributed transactions as much as possible
In a microservice architecture, using distributed transactions may cause problems in history and scalability. Therefore, avoid using distributed transactions as much as possible to achieve consistency control of data during microservice asynchronous communication.
4. Conclusion
Dealing with asynchronous communication issues in microservice architecture is an important issue in the microservice development process. This article introduces the reasons and implementation methods of asynchronous communication, and provides suggestions on how to handle asynchronous communication in practice, which has reference significance for the design and implementation of microservice architecture.
The above is the detailed content of How to deal with asynchronous communication between services in microservice architecture?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools