Laravel and thinkphp are two popular PHP frameworks, both with their own advantages and characteristics. In actual development, sometimes it is necessary to convert Laravel code to thinkphp. This article will introduce the specific conversion methods and precautions.
1. The basic concepts of Laravel and thinkphp
Laravel is an excellent PHP framework. It adopts a simple and elegant syntax style and provides a wealth of functional modules, including routing and template engines. , ORM, etc. Laravel's development model focuses on MVC separation, which makes its code structure very clear and easy to maintain, and also brings higher development efficiency.
thinkphp is also an excellent PHP framework with a wide user base and rich documentation support. It adopts a development model similar to Laravel, focuses on MVC separation, provides convenient routing and template engine functions, and also has powerful ORM functions.
2. Code conversion method
- Route conversion
The route definition method in Laravel is relatively free, and you can define GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc. Different types of routing also support advanced features such as regular expression matching. In thinkphp, routing definitions are relatively standardized and need to be defined in a certain format.
Laravel code example:
Route::get('/user/{id}', function ($id) { return 'User '.$id; });
thinkphp code example:
Route::get('/user/:id', function ($id) { return 'User '.$id; });
- Model conversion
The model operation in Laravel is more convenient. Can directly operate the database and integrates advanced functions such as soft deletion. In thinkphp, model operation is also more convenient, but you need to pay attention to naming conventions and the writing method of complex query operations.
Laravel code example:
$user = User::find(1); $user->delete();
thinkphp code example:
$user = UserModel::get(1); $user->delete();
- Controller conversion
Controller definition method in Laravel It is relatively flexible and supports various forms such as resource controller and RESTful controller. In thinkphp, controller definitions are relatively standardized and need to be defined in a certain format.
Laravel code example:
class UserController extends Controller { public function index() { $users = User::all(); return view('users.index', compact('users')); } public function create() { return view('users.create'); } public function store(Request $request) { User::create($request->all()); return redirect()->route('users.index'); } public function show($id) { $user = User::find($id); return view('users.show', compact('user')); } public function edit($id) { $user = User::find($id); return view('users.edit', compact('user')); } public function update(Request $request, $id) { $user = User::find($id); $user->update($request->all()); return redirect()->route('users.index'); } public function destroy($id) { $user = User::find($id); $user->delete(); return redirect()->route('users.index'); } }
thinkphp code example:
class UserController extends Controller { public function index() { $users = UserModel::all(); return $this->fetch('users/index', ['users' => $users]); } public function create() { return $this->fetch('users/create'); } public function save() { $user = new UserModel(); $user->name = input('post.name'); $user->email = input('post.email'); $user->save(); return $this->redirect(url('users/index')); } public function read($id) { $user = UserModel::get($id); return $this->fetch('users/show', ['user' => $user]); } public function edit($id) { $user = UserModel::get($id); return $this->fetch('users/edit', ['user' => $user]); } public function update($id) { $user = UserModel::get($id); $user->name = input('post.name'); $user->email = input('post.email'); $user->save(); return $this->redirect(url('users/index')); } public function delete($id) { $user = UserModel::get($id); $user->delete(); return $this->redirect(url('users/index')); } }
3. Notes
- Naming convention
Laravel and thinkphp both have strict naming standards and need to be named and defined according to the standards, otherwise problems will occur in code conversion.
- Differences in ORM operations
Laravel's ORM operation is more convenient, and the operation method can be called directly through the object. In thinkphp, ORM operation is also more convenient, but you need to pay attention to the calling method and the way to write query conditions.
- Specifications of route definition
Route definition in Laravel is relatively free, and you can flexibly define routes as needed. In thinkphp, routes need to be defined according to specifications, otherwise a 404 error will occur.
In short, when converting Laravel code to thinkphp, you need to pay attention to the differences in naming conventions, model operations, route definitions, etc., and you need to have certain framework knowledge and code implementation experience. If you understand the syntax rules and features of both frameworks, the conversion process will become easier and more enjoyable.
The above is the detailed content of How to convert Laravel code to thinkphp code. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Laravelcanbeeffectivelyusedinreal-worldapplicationsforbuildingscalablewebsolutions.1)ItsimplifiesCRUDoperationsinRESTfulAPIsusingEloquentORM.2)Laravel'secosystem,includingtoolslikeNova,enhancesdevelopment.3)Itaddressesperformancewithcachingsystems,en

Laravel's core functions in back-end development include routing system, EloquentORM, migration function, cache system and queue system. 1. The routing system simplifies URL mapping and improves code organization and maintenance. 2.EloquentORM provides object-oriented data operations to improve development efficiency. 3. The migration function manages the database structure through version control to ensure consistency. 4. The cache system reduces database queries and improves response speed. 5. The queue system effectively processes large-scale data, avoid blocking user requests, and improve overall performance.

Laravel performs strongly in back-end development, simplifying database operations through EloquentORM, controllers and service classes handle business logic, and providing queues, events and other functions. 1) EloquentORM maps database tables through the model to simplify query. 2) Business logic is processed in controllers and service classes to improve modularity and maintainability. 3) Other functions such as queue systems help to handle complex needs.

The Laravel development project was chosen because of its flexibility and power to suit the needs of different sizes and complexities. Laravel provides routing system, EloquentORM, Artisan command line and other functions, supporting the development of from simple blogs to complex enterprise-level systems.

The comparison between Laravel and Python in the development environment and ecosystem is as follows: 1. The development environment of Laravel is simple, only PHP and Composer are required. It provides a rich range of extension packages such as LaravelForge, but the extension package maintenance may not be timely. 2. The development environment of Python is also simple, only Python and pip are required. The ecosystem is huge and covers multiple fields, but version and dependency management may be complex.

How does Laravel play a role in backend logic? It simplifies and enhances backend development through routing systems, EloquentORM, authentication and authorization, event and listeners, and performance optimization. 1. The routing system allows the definition of URL structure and request processing logic. 2.EloquentORM simplifies database interaction. 3. The authentication and authorization system is convenient for user management. 4. The event and listener implement loosely coupled code structure. 5. Performance optimization improves application efficiency through caching and queueing.

Laravel's popularity includes its simplified development process, providing a pleasant development environment, and rich features. 1) It absorbs the design philosophy of RubyonRails, combining the flexibility of PHP. 2) Provide tools such as EloquentORM, Blade template engine, etc. to improve development efficiency. 3) Its MVC architecture and dependency injection mechanism make the code more modular and testable. 4) Provides powerful debugging tools and performance optimization methods such as caching systems and best practices.

Both Django and Laravel are full-stack frameworks. Django is suitable for Python developers and complex business logic, while Laravel is suitable for PHP developers and elegant syntax. 1.Django is based on Python and follows the "battery-complete" philosophy, suitable for rapid development and high concurrency. 2.Laravel is based on PHP, emphasizing the developer experience, and is suitable for small to medium-sized projects.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.