Will the speed really be the same if you add 1MB and 1GB files?
Exploring the difference in appending write speed between large and small files
Programmers often use the append
function to append data to files. A common question is: Is the speed of appending to write 1MB files and 1GB files the same?
Let's assume that we append the string "hello world" to the 1MB and 1GB log files, respectively. Intuitively, it takes longer to process large files. But the reality is not that simple.
The conclusion is that append write efficiency is not significantly affected by file size. The operating system uses a file pointer to point to the end of the file, and append writes directly to this location without additional addressing or data movement. Therefore, writing "hello world" to 1MB or 1GB files has very little time difference.
However, in practical applications, writing speeds of oversized files (such as 10GB) may become slower. This is not a problem with the efficiency of the append
operation itself, but the result of the combined effect of factors such as disk I/O speed, memory cache, and operating system scheduling. Extremely large files can cause frequent disk access, which can slow down write speed. This has nothing to do with the append write mechanism, but is a limitation of the file system and hardware resources.
Therefore, the speed of writing small files and large files in the append
operation itself is basically the same, but the actual writing speed is indirectly affected by the system I/O performance and resource management.
The above is the detailed content of Will the speed really be the same if you add 1MB and 1GB files?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

WhentestingGocodewithinitfunctions,useexplicitsetupfunctionsorseparatetestfilestoavoiddependencyoninitfunctionsideeffects.1)Useexplicitsetupfunctionstocontrolglobalvariableinitialization.2)Createseparatetestfilestobypassinitfunctionsandsetupthetesten

Go'serrorhandlingreturnserrorsasvalues,unlikeJavaandPythonwhichuseexceptions.1)Go'smethodensuresexpliciterrorhandling,promotingrobustcodebutincreasingverbosity.2)JavaandPython'sexceptionsallowforcleanercodebutcanleadtooverlookederrorsifnotmanagedcare

AneffectiveinterfaceinGoisminimal,clear,andpromotesloosecoupling.1)Minimizetheinterfaceforflexibilityandeaseofimplementation.2)Useinterfacesforabstractiontoswapimplementationswithoutchangingcallingcode.3)Designfortestabilitybyusinginterfacestomockdep

Centralized error handling can improve the readability and maintainability of code in Go language. Its implementation methods and advantages include: 1. Separate error handling logic from business logic and simplify code. 2. Ensure the consistency of error handling by centrally handling. 3. Use defer and recover to capture and process panics to enhance program robustness.

InGo,alternativestoinitfunctionsincludecustominitializationfunctionsandsingletons.1)Custominitializationfunctionsallowexplicitcontroloverwheninitializationoccurs,usefulfordelayedorconditionalsetups.2)Singletonsensureone-timeinitializationinconcurrent

Gohandlesinterfacesandtypeassertionseffectively,enhancingcodeflexibilityandrobustness.1)Typeassertionsallowruntimetypechecking,asseenwiththeShapeinterfaceandCircletype.2)Typeswitcheshandlemultipletypesefficiently,usefulforvariousshapesimplementingthe

Go language error handling becomes more flexible and readable through errors.Is and errors.As functions. 1.errors.Is is used to check whether the error is the same as the specified error and is suitable for the processing of the error chain. 2.errors.As can not only check the error type, but also convert the error to a specific type, which is convenient for extracting error information. Using these functions can simplify error handling logic, but pay attention to the correct delivery of error chains and avoid excessive dependence to prevent code complexity.

TomakeGoapplicationsrunfasterandmoreefficiently,useprofilingtools,leverageconcurrency,andmanagememoryeffectively.1)UsepprofforCPUandmemoryprofilingtoidentifybottlenecks.2)Utilizegoroutinesandchannelstoparallelizetasksandimproveperformance.3)Implement


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
