This article explores Bootstrap Native, a project aiming to replace jQuery in Bootstrap's JavaScript components with plain JavaScript. Let's delve into its benefits, usage, and limitations.
Key Advantages of Bootstrap Native:
- Enhanced Performance: Plain JavaScript generally outperforms jQuery, leading to faster execution and a more responsive user experience.
- Reduced File Size: Bootstrap Native significantly reduces the overall JavaScript footprint. A comparison shows that Bootstrap with jQuery ranges from 36.5KB to 50KB (minified and gzipped), while Bootstrap Native, including polyfills, ranges from 8.9KB to 19.9KB. This smaller size contributes to faster page load times.
- Simplified Development: By eliminating jQuery, development becomes cleaner and potentially easier to manage.
Browser Compatibility and Polyfills:
Bootstrap Native boasts broad browser support, including older versions like IE8 , achieved through polyfills. Two options are available: Polyfill.io (a service providing browser-specific polyfills) and minifill (a lightweight custom polyfill).
Implementation:
Integrating Bootstrap Native is straightforward. Replace the standard Bootstrap JavaScript files with Bootstrap Native's bootstrap-native-v4.min.js
(available via CDN or local download), and include the chosen polyfill (if needed) in the section.
Limitations:
Bootstrap Native isn't a complete, feature-for-feature port. Some less-used functionalities have been omitted for performance optimization. Key differences include:
-
Custom Events: While Bootstrap extensively uses custom events, Bootstrap Native only provides them for the Carousel and Button components. However, you can easily implement them for other components using the
CustomEvent
API. - Programmatic API: Bootstrap offers a rich programmatic API for controlling components. Bootstrap Native often lacks this level of control for components like Modal, Dropdown, Tab, Alert, and Carousel.
- Other Minor Differences: Subtle variations exist in other components; for example, the dropdown menu's behavior differs slightly.
Conclusion:
Bootstrap Native presents a compelling alternative for developers prioritizing performance and preferring plain JavaScript. While it doesn't perfectly mirror Bootstrap's jQuery version, its benefits often outweigh the minor functional differences. The project's active development and responsive community support further enhance its appeal. Consider its strengths and limitations carefully before integrating it into your next project.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):
- Benefits of using Bootstrap without jQuery: Improved performance, smaller file size, simplified project structure, and the ability to utilize modern JavaScript features.
- How to use Bootstrap without jQuery: Use Bootstrap Native.
- Limitations of using Bootstrap without jQuery: Not all Bootstrap components are supported, and some features might function slightly differently.
- Compatibility with existing projects: Possible, but may require code modifications.
- Browser compatibility: Supports most modern browsers, but not Internet Explorer (without polyfills).
- Use with other JavaScript libraries: Possible, but compatibility adjustments might be necessary.
- Contributing to the project: The project is open source; contribute via GitHub.
- Learning resources: Consult the Bootstrap Native documentation and online tutorials.
- Best practices: Maintain clean code, test thoroughly across browsers, and stay updated with the latest versions.
This revised output maintains the original meaning while rephrasing sentences, using synonyms, and restructuring paragraphs for improved flow and readability. The image remains in its original format and location.
The above is the detailed content of Bootstrap Native: Using Bootstrap Components without jQuery. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C and JavaScript achieve interoperability through WebAssembly. 1) C code is compiled into WebAssembly module and introduced into JavaScript environment to enhance computing power. 2) In game development, C handles physics engines and graphics rendering, and JavaScript is responsible for game logic and user interface.

JavaScript is widely used in websites, mobile applications, desktop applications and server-side programming. 1) In website development, JavaScript operates DOM together with HTML and CSS to achieve dynamic effects and supports frameworks such as jQuery and React. 2) Through ReactNative and Ionic, JavaScript is used to develop cross-platform mobile applications. 3) The Electron framework enables JavaScript to build desktop applications. 4) Node.js allows JavaScript to run on the server side and supports high concurrent requests.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function