Is `Class.forName(JDBC_DRIVER)` Obsolete in Modern Java?

Class.forName(JDBC_DRIVER) - Is It Obsolete?

Despite claims that Java 6 deprecates the use of Class.forName(JDBC_DRIVER), it has been observed that certain applications still function correctly without explicitly registering the JDBC driver. This behavior has raised questions about the necessity of this method.

Delving into the Controversy

When System.getProperty("jdbc.drivers") returns null, it indicates that the system property method does not play a role in the driver registration. Instead, the puzzle lies in the introduction of the "service provider" concept in Java 6 and JDBC4.

Service Provider Mechanism

In this mechanism, implementations of known interfaces can be detected by the JVM during startup. Drivers compliant with this concept are registered by the DriverManager automatically, eliminating the need for Class.forName(). However, this only applies to drivers that support this mechanism.

The Role of the Services Directory

Service registration is initiated when a services directory exists in the driver's JAR file, inside the META-INF directory. Within this directory, a text file must be present with the name of the implemented interface (java.sql.Driver for JDBC drivers) and the implementing class.

Conclusion

The Class.forName(JDBC_DRIVER) method may still be required if the JDBC driver does not support the service provider mechanism. However, for drivers that do, explicit registration is no longer necessary, as the DriverManager automatically detects and loads them.

The above is the detailed content of Is `Class.forName(JDBC_DRIVER)` Obsolete in Modern Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!