Home >Backend Development >C++ >`push_back` vs. `emplace_back`: When Should You Use Which?

`push_back` vs. `emplace_back`: When Should You Use Which?

Susan Sarandon
Susan SarandonOriginal
2024-12-29 17:22:10182browse

`push_back` vs. `emplace_back`: When Should You Use Which?

push_back vs emplace_back

In understanding the differences between push_back and emplace_back, it's crucial to grasp the distinction between the various overloads for push_back.

push_back Overloads

push_back offers three overloads handling different data types and references:

  • push_back(const Type& _Val): Receives a copy of the provided data type.
  • push_back(Type& _Val): Handles a reference to the actual data type.
  • push_back(Type&& _Val): Accepts a rvalue reference to the data type.

emplace_back Overload in MSVC10

In Microsoft Visual C 10 (MSVC10), emplace_back has an additional overload:

  • emplace_back(Type&&& _Val): This overload is essentially redundant and has no unique functionality compared to the push_back(Type&& _Val) overload.

C 0x's emplace_back Overload

The genuine C 0x definition of emplace_back differs significantly:

  • emplace_back(Args&&&...): This overload enables the container to construct an object directly within itself using a variadic list of arguments.

Advantages of emplace_back in C 0x

The C 0x version of emplace_back offers several advantages:

  • Direct Object Construction: It directly constructs an object within the container without creating a temporary object first.
  • Faster Performance: This method bypasses potential copies and moves, which is particularly beneficial in complex scenarios where push_back might introduce unnecessary copies or moves.

Conclusion

In C , emplace_back is a powerful addition to the push_back function that enables straightforward construction of objects within a container using a variadic list of arguments. While MSVC10 offers a non-conforming implementation of emplace_back, the genuine C 0x implementation provides significant performance benefits and allows for more efficient construction of objects within containers.

The above is the detailed content of `push_back` vs. `emplace_back`: When Should You Use Which?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn