search
HomeBackend DevelopmentGolangHow Can I Efficiently Unmarshal JSON Data into Specific Structs When Using Go's `json.Unmarshal` with `interface{}`?

How Can I Efficiently Unmarshal JSON Data into Specific Structs When Using Go's `json.Unmarshal` with `interface{}`?

Unmarshaling into an Interface{} and Type Assertion

Problem Statement

When using Go's json.Unmarshal to decode strings from a message system, it is found that the result is a map[string]interface{} instead of the expected struct types (Somthing1 or Somthing2), making type assertion impossible.

Root Cause

The json.Unmarshal function, when unmarshaling into an interface{}, defaults to known types like []interface{} and map[string]interface{}. In the given code, the interface variable input receives a map[string]interface{} representing the unmarshaled JSON data, but the switch statement attempts to assert it as Somthing1 or Somthing2 directly.

Solution

Since the JSON is not natively unmarshaled into the desired structs, there are two options to address this issue:

1. Inspect and Convert from the Generic Map:

One approach is to inspect the map[string]interface{} and manually unpack the data into the appropriate struct types. However, this requires careful handling of potential errors and manual assignment of values.

2. Utilize a Custom JSON Unmarshaller:

A cleaner solution is to create a custom JSON unmarshaller to handle the unmarshaling process. This custom unmarshaller can discern the correct struct type based on the JSON data and unmarshal it accordingly. Here's an example of such an unmarshaller:

type Unpacker struct {
    Data       interface{}
}

func (u *Unpacker) UnmarshalJSON(b []byte) error {
    smth1 := &Something1{}
    err := json.Unmarshal(b, smth1)

    // no error, but we also need to make sure we unmarshaled something
    if err == nil && smth1.Thing != "" {
        u.Data = smth1
        return nil
    }

    // abort if we have an error other than the wrong type
    if _, ok := err.(*json.UnmarshalTypeError); err != nil && !ok {
        return err
    }

    smth2 := &Something2{}
    err = json.Unmarshal(b, smth2)
    if err != nil {
        return err
    }

    u.Data = smth2
    return nil
}

By passing an instance of this custom unmarshaller to json.Unmarshal, the resulting Data field will contain the unmarshaled data in the correct struct type, allowing for seamless type assertion.

The above is the detailed content of How Can I Efficiently Unmarshal JSON Data into Specific Structs When Using Go's `json.Unmarshal` with `interface{}`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Golang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsGolang vs. Python: The Pros and ConsApr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedGolang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw SpeedApr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Why Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedWhy Use Golang? Benefits and Advantages ExplainedApr 21, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Reasons for choosing Golang include: 1) high concurrency performance, 2) static type system, 3) garbage collection mechanism, 4) rich standard libraries and ecosystems, which make it an ideal choice for developing efficient and reliable software.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed ComparisonGolang vs. C : Performance and Speed ComparisonApr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Is Golang Faster Than C  ? Exploring the LimitsIs Golang Faster Than C ? Exploring the LimitsApr 20, 2025 am 12:19 AM

Golang performs better in compilation time and concurrent processing, while C has more advantages in running speed and memory management. 1.Golang has fast compilation speed and is suitable for rapid development. 2.C runs fast and is suitable for performance-critical applications. 3. Golang is simple and efficient in concurrent processing, suitable for concurrent programming. 4.C Manual memory management provides higher performance, but increases development complexity.

Golang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingGolang: From Web Services to System ProgrammingApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang's application in web services and system programming is mainly reflected in its simplicity, efficiency and concurrency. 1) In web services, Golang supports the creation of high-performance web applications and APIs through powerful HTTP libraries and concurrent processing capabilities. 2) In system programming, Golang uses features close to hardware and compatibility with C language to be suitable for operating system development and embedded systems.

Golang vs. C  : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceGolang vs. C : Benchmarks and Real-World PerformanceApr 20, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang and C have their own advantages and disadvantages in performance comparison: 1. Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, but garbage collection may affect performance; 2.C provides higher performance and hardware control, but has high development complexity. When making a choice, you need to consider project requirements and team skills in a comprehensive way.

Golang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisGolang vs. Python: A Comparative AnalysisApr 20, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golang is suitable for high-performance and concurrent programming scenarios, while Python is suitable for rapid development and data processing. 1.Golang emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, and is suitable for back-end services and microservices. 2. Python is known for its concise syntax and rich libraries, suitable for data science and machine learning.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

DVWA

DVWA

Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software