Where Does std::atomic Hide Its Lock?
In multi-element data structures, standard atomic types may not always be lock-free. This is attributed to the inability of the CPU to process such data without the assistance of a lock. To illustrate, consider the following example:
#include <iostream> #include <atomic> struct foo { double a; double b; }; std::atomic<foo> var; int main() { std::cout <p>Its output for Linux/gcc reveals the following:</p> <pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">0 16 16
Assuming the atomic type and the foo structure occupy the same amount of space, it appears unlikely that a lock is stored in the atomic. But what exactly is the truth behind this conundrum?
Lock Location and Implications for Multiple Instances
The customary approach involves employing a hash table of mutexes (or spinlocks) keyed to the address of the atomic object. This hash function favors the lowest bits of the address as an index into an array of size 2^n.
Ore else, the LLVM std::atomic implementation incorporates higher address bits to prevent automatic aliasing. This ensures that objects separated by a significant power of 2 are not mapped to the same lock.
Importantly, atomic objects only operate in a lock-free manner when shared in memory between distinct processes, where each process is equipped with its own hash table of locks.
Collisions within the hash table may warrant caution. While this poses no correctness issue, it could harm performance by fostering contention among multiple threads. However, this is a relatively infrequent occurrence, as lock-free atomic objects are typically favored on platforms of concern.
Regarding deadlocks, rest assured that this is not a concern as std::atomic functions refrain from acquiring locks on multiple objects simultaneously. Consequently, the library code responsible for lock acquisition never attempts to secure an additional lock while holding an existing one.
The above is the detailed content of Does `std::atomic` Use a Hidden Lock and, If So, Where Is It Located?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The future of C will focus on parallel computing, security, modularization and AI/machine learning: 1) Parallel computing will be enhanced through features such as coroutines; 2) Security will be improved through stricter type checking and memory management mechanisms; 3) Modulation will simplify code organization and compilation; 4) AI and machine learning will prompt C to adapt to new needs, such as numerical computing and GPU programming support.

C is still important in modern programming because of its efficient, flexible and powerful nature. 1)C supports object-oriented programming, suitable for system programming, game development and embedded systems. 2) Polymorphism is the highlight of C, allowing the call to derived class methods through base class pointers or references to enhance the flexibility and scalability of the code.

The performance differences between C# and C are mainly reflected in execution speed and resource management: 1) C usually performs better in numerical calculations and string operations because it is closer to hardware and has no additional overhead such as garbage collection; 2) C# is more concise in multi-threaded programming, but its performance is slightly inferior to C; 3) Which language to choose should be determined based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C isnotdying;it'sevolving.1)C remainsrelevantduetoitsversatilityandefficiencyinperformance-criticalapplications.2)Thelanguageiscontinuouslyupdated,withC 20introducingfeatureslikemodulesandcoroutinestoimproveusabilityandperformance.3)Despitechallen

C is widely used and important in the modern world. 1) In game development, C is widely used for its high performance and polymorphism, such as UnrealEngine and Unity. 2) In financial trading systems, C's low latency and high throughput make it the first choice, suitable for high-frequency trading and real-time data analysis.

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use
