search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++Why Does `ifstream::eof()` Behave Differently with `get()` and the Extraction Operator (`>>`)?

Why Does `ifstream::eof()` Behave Differently with `get()` and the Extraction Operator (`>>`)?
>`)? " />

Diving into ifstream's eof() Function

Understanding the behavior of ifstream's eof() function can be puzzling, as illustrated in the provided code snippet:

<h1>include <iostream></iostream>
</h1><h1>include <fstream></fstream>
</h1><p>int main() {</p><pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">std::fstream inf( "ex.txt", std::ios::in );
while( !inf.eof() ) {
    std::cout > c ) {
    std::cout <p>}<br></p>

Let's delve into the explanation provided:

When EOF Really Sets In

The eof() function detects when a read operation attempts to access data beyond the end of the file. This means that:

  • If you have a file with the content "abc" and read 3 characters, eof() will be false.
  • But if you try to read a 4th character, eof() will become true, indicating that the end of the file has been reached.

The reason for this behavior is to ensure compatibility with different devices, such as pipes and sockets, where the concept of file size may not be as straightforward as with a text file.

Unveiling the Magic of get() and >>

The two loops in the code snippet use different approaches to read the contents of the file:

  • The first loop uses inf.get() to retrieve characters one at a time. When the end of the file is reached, get() returns -1.
  • The second loop uses inf >> c, which combines a read attempt and assignment in one operation. This approach sets c to the value read from the file, but if the read fails (due to reaching the end of the file), it evaluates to false, terminating the loop.

This explains why the first loop reads an extra character and displays -1, while the second loop gives the correct output – it terminates the loop before attempting to read beyond the end of the file.

Avoiding the Perils of -1

To avoid relying on the magic number -1 to identify the end of the file, it is recommended to use std::char_traits::eof() or std::istream::traits_type::eof() instead.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does `ifstream::eof()` Behave Differently with `get()` and the Extraction Operator (`>>`)?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
C   XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsC XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsApr 22, 2025 am 12:05 AM

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C   and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportC and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportApr 21, 2025 am 12:02 AM

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

C# vs. C  : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesC# vs. C : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesApr 20, 2025 am 12:03 AM

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

C# vs. C  : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsC# vs. C : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsApr 19, 2025 am 12:07 AM

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

C# vs. C  : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceC# vs. C : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceApr 18, 2025 am 12:13 AM

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C# vs. C  : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesC# vs. C : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesApr 17, 2025 am 12:02 AM

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

From XML to C  : Data Transformation and ManipulationFrom XML to C : Data Transformation and ManipulationApr 16, 2025 am 12:08 AM

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# vs. C  : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionC# vs. C : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionApr 15, 2025 am 12:16 AM

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

SecLists

SecLists

SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

Atom editor mac version download

Atom editor mac version download

The most popular open source editor

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

DVWA

DVWA

Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software