


Storing Functions with Non-Homogenous Signatures in a Map
Problem Introduction
In C , the need arises to associate functions with different signatures with unique identifiers for dynamic invocation based on runtime arguments. However, the standard containers do not directly support the storage of non-homogenous function types.
Utilizing Type Erasure and Template Operators
One approach to overcome this limitation is type erasure, which involves encapsulating function types into a container that erases specific type information. This allows for the uniform storage of functions with varying signatures. To facilitate this process, a custom data structure, AnyCallable, is defined:
template<typename ret> struct AnyCallable { AnyCallable() {} template<typename f> AnyCallable(F&& fun) : AnyCallable(std::function(std::forward<f>(fun))) {} template<typename ... args> AnyCallable(std::function<ret> fun) : m_any(fun) {} template<typename ... args> Ret operator()(Args&& ... args) { return std::invoke(std::any_cast<:function>>(m_any), std::forward<args>(args)...); } std::any m_any; };</args></:function></typename></ret></typename></f></typename></typename>
The AnyCallable accepts heterogeneous function types and provides a generic operator() for invoking the encapsulated function with matching arguments.
Example Implementation
Using the AnyCallable data structure, we can now create a map that stores functions with different signatures:
std::map<:string anycallable>> map; map["foo"] = &foo; map["bar"] = &bar;</:string>
To invoke the functions dynamically based on their unique string identifiers, we utilize the operator() provided by AnyCallable:
map["foo"](1, 2); map["bar"]("Hello", 1, 2);
This approach ensures type safety and dynamic invocation of functions with non-homogenous signatures, making it a versatile solution for storing and executing method pointers with different inputs.
The above is the detailed content of How Can You Store Functions with Non-Homogeneous Signatures in a Map in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools