Why Does `long double` Sometimes Take Up More Space Than `double`?

Long Double vs. Double: Discrepancies in Data Size

Determining the size of data types can vary across different systems. While the typical assumption is that long double is 8 bytes and double is 12 bytes, this may not always hold true.

Size Discrepancy on Specific Systems

In the context of the XP 32-bit operating system, using the sizeof() operator reveals that long double registers at 12 bytes, contrasting with the 8 bytes of double. This observation deviates from the widely reported notion that long double is 8 bytes.

Compiler Implementation

The disparity in data size stems from the compiler's implementation. On the x86 architecture, compilers often utilize the 80-bit extended precision type for long double. However, this extended precision may demand 12 or even 16 bytes for optimal data structure maintenance.

Moreover, some compilers may employ long double for a 128-bit quadruple precision format, currently realized through software implementation.

Impact on Value Range

The increased size of long double has the potential to extend the range of values it can represent. Nonetheless, this expansion is ultimately subject to the compiler's design.

In scenarios where the value surpasses the range of a double, the long double extension beyond 8 bytes becomes necessary. Conversely, if the value falls within the double's range, the compiler may elect to retain 8-byte representation.

In conclusion, the size and range of long double can vary based on the compiler's implementation. While specific systems may report 12 bytes for long double, its potential to store a broader range of values remains a compiler-dependent factor. By understanding these nuances, programmers can optimize their code for optimal representation and performance.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does `long double` Sometimes Take Up More Space Than `double`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!