Home > Article > Backend Development > How Does the Default Copy Constructor Handle Classes with Objects Lacking Declared Copy Constructors?
When declaring classes in C , the compiler may automatically provide a default copy constructor if an explicit implementation is not provided. However, the behavior of this constructor becomes more complex when dealing with classes containing objects that do not have their declared copy constructors.
Consider the following code:
class Foo { Bar bar; }; class Bar { int i; Baz baz; }; class Baz { int j; }; Foo f1; Foo f2(f1);
The question arises: what will the default copy constructor do in this scenario?
The compiler-generated copy constructor for Foo will behave as follows:
Therefore, in the example provided, when constructing f2 using f1, the compiler will:
Since Baz does not have a declared copy constructor, the compiler will generate a default copy constructor for it. This default copy constructor will perform shallow copy, copying the value of j but not the object it points to.
It's important to note that this shallow copy behavior means that any objects pointed to by the member variables of Foo will not be copied. This can have unintended consequences if the original objects are modified later, as the modified values will not be reflected in the copied objects.
For deeper control over the copying process, it is recommended to explicitly define copy constructors for any classes that require controlled copying of their member variables.
The above is the detailed content of How Does the Default Copy Constructor Handle Classes with Objects Lacking Declared Copy Constructors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!