Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Does C Use the Scope Resolution Operator (::) While Java Doesn't?

Why Does C Use the Scope Resolution Operator (::) While Java Doesn't?

Linda Hamilton
Linda HamiltonOriginal
2024-11-12 02:58:01373browse

Why Does C   Use the Scope Resolution Operator (::) While Java Doesn't?

Why C Introduced the Scope Resolution Operator

In comparison to Java, C provides a distinct scope resolution operator (::) instead of relying solely on the dot (.) operator. Despite Java's success without a separate operator, C necessitated this addition due to a unique language feature: the ability to use the same identifier for both a member variable and a derived class type.

This distinction becomes apparent when considering code like the example below:

struct foo { int blah; };
struct thingy { int data; };
struct bar : public foo { thingy foo; };

In this scenario, both the member variable foo within the bar struct and the derived class type foo share the same name. To resolve this ambiguity, the scope resolution operator :: is employed.

When the compiler encounters a ., it assumes the left-hand operand is an object. In contrast, :: signifies a typename, namespace, or the global namespace. This differentiation enables the compiler to interpret code like the following:

test.foo.data = 5;
test.foo::blah = 10;

In the first statement, test.foo.data is recognized as accessing the data member of the object test.foo. In the second statement, test.foo::blah denotes accessing the blah member of the derived class foo.

Thus, the scope resolution operator in C serves as a precision tool for resolving ambiguities created by the allowance of identical identifiers for member variables and derived class types.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does C Use the Scope Resolution Operator (::) While Java Doesn't?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn