Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why does `long long` behave differently than expected in C/C ?
Understanding Long Long in C/C
When working with various data types in C and C , it's crucial to understand the nuances of each type. One common misconception is the behavior of long long.
Consider the following code snippet:
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int num1 = 1000000000; long num2 = 1000000000; long long num3; //num3 = 100000000000; long long num4 = ~0; printf("%u %u %u", sizeof(num1), sizeof(num2), sizeof(num3)); printf("%d %ld %lld %llu", num1, num2, num3, num4); return 0; }
Compiling this code raises an error when uncommenting the line assigning 100000000000 to num3: "integer constant is too large for long type." However, executing the code with the commented line still prints values larger than 10000000000.
This behavior stems from a misconception about type inference. The literal 100000000000 is an integer constant, but its value exceeds the range of the int data type (32 bits). Therefore, it's intended as a long type constant. However, by default, C and C consider such literals as int, leading to the error.
To resolve this, it's necessary to explicitly specify the type of the literal using a suffix. The LL suffix declares num3 as a long long type:
long long num3 = 100000000000LL;
This change allows the code to compile successfully without any errors or unexpected behavior.
The above is the detailed content of Why does `long long` behave differently than expected in C/C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!