search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++Why Does C 20 Prohibit Aggregate Initialization for Structs with User-Declared Constructors?

Why Does C  20 Prohibit Aggregate Initialization for Structs with User-Declared Constructors?

Breaking Aggregate Initialization: Impact of C 20 Modifications

Since the transition from C 17 to C 20, aggregate initialization has undergone a significant change when explicit constructors are defaulted or deleted. In this article, we delve into the reasoning behind this modification and explore its implications.

Origin of the Change

Previously, in C 17, aggregate initialization was allowed for structs with explicitly defaulted or deleted constructors. However, with the adoption of C 20, the C standard was revised to disallow aggregate initialization for structs with any user-declared constructors, including defaulted or deleted ones.

Justification

The key motivation behind this change lies in addressing potential inconsistencies and confusion in aggregate initialization. The standard committee recognized that allowing aggregate initialization for structs with user-declared constructors, even defaulted or deleted ones, led to unexpected and often erroneous behavior.

Consider the following example:

<code class="cpp">struct Foo
{
    Foo() = default;
    int bar;
};

int main()
{
    Foo test = { 0 }; // Error: Cannot initialize due to defaulted constructor
}</code>

In this case, the default constructor is explicitly provided, even though it essentially has no effect on the struct's initialization. However, allowing aggregate initialization in this scenario could bypass the constructor, potentially leading to undefined behavior or inconsistencies.

Impact on Developer Practice

The change in aggregate initialization practices has shifted the recommended approach for structuring and initializing classes and structs. Previously, it was common practice to explicitly default constructors to improve code readability and to ensure cleaner syntax. However, with the current standard, it is no longer advisable to default constructors for classes or structs that require initialization.

Conclusion

The modification to aggregate initialization in C 20 was made to enhance code clarity, consistency, and safety. By disallowing aggregate initialization for structs with user-declared constructors, the standard aims to eliminate potential pitfalls and improve the overall reliability of codebases. Developers should adjust their practices accordingly to align with these changes, leading to more robust and maintainable C applications.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does C 20 Prohibit Aggregate Initialization for Structs with User-Declared Constructors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
C   XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsC XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsApr 22, 2025 am 12:05 AM

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C   and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportC and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportApr 21, 2025 am 12:02 AM

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

C# vs. C  : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesC# vs. C : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesApr 20, 2025 am 12:03 AM

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

C# vs. C  : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsC# vs. C : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsApr 19, 2025 am 12:07 AM

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

C# vs. C  : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceC# vs. C : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceApr 18, 2025 am 12:13 AM

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C# vs. C  : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesC# vs. C : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesApr 17, 2025 am 12:02 AM

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

From XML to C  : Data Transformation and ManipulationFrom XML to C : Data Transformation and ManipulationApr 16, 2025 am 12:08 AM

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# vs. C  : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionC# vs. C : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionApr 15, 2025 am 12:16 AM

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

DVWA

DVWA

Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software