search
HomeBackend DevelopmentC++Does `vector::erase()` Destroy Objects in a Vector of Pointers?

 Does `vector::erase()` Destroy Objects in a Vector of Pointers?

Does Vector::Erase Destroy Objects in a Vector of Pointers?

When dealing with vectors containing object pointers, erasing an element using vector::erase() raises concerns about the fate of the pointed-to objects. While vector::erase() removes the element from the vector, it does not automatically destroy the actual object.

Behavior of Vector::Erase

Vector::erase() removes the element from the vector but does not take ownership of destroying the object. However, if the contained object is a raw pointer, vector::erase() does not call its destructor before removal.

Handling Raw Pointers

To ensure proper resource management, you must explicitly delete each contained pointer to delete the objects they point to. This can be achieved using a loop:

<code class="cpp">void clearVectorContents(std::vector<yourclass> &a) {
    for (int i = 0; i <p><strong>Avoiding Raw Pointers</strong></p>
<p>Storing raw pointers in standard containers is generally discouraged. For objects allocated dynamically, consider using smart pointers like boost::shared_ptr to handle memory management.</p>
<p><strong>Generic and Elegant Solution</strong></p>
<p>A more elegant solution utilizes templates and the for_each algorithm:</p>
<pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false"><code class="cpp">// Functor for deleting pointers in vector
template<class t> class DeleteVector {
public:
    void operator()(T x) const {
        delete x;
    }
};</class></code>

This functor can be used with for_each to delete pointers in a vector:

<code class="cpp">for_each(myclassVector.begin(), myclassVector.end(), DeleteVector<myclass>());</myclass></code>

Example Usage

Consider a vector of pointers to myclass objects. The following code allocates, prints, and deletes the objects:

<code class="cpp">#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <functional>

class myclass {
public:
    int i;
    myclass(): i(10) {}
};

// Functor for deleting pointers in vector
template<class t> class DeleteVector {
public:
    void operator()(T x) const {
        delete x;
    }
};

int main() {
    // Vector of myclass pointers
    std::vector<myclass> myclassVector;

    // Add objects to the vector
    for (int i = 0; i i;
    }

    // Delete objects using functor and for_each
    for_each(myclassVector.begin(), myclassVector.end(), DeleteVector<myclass>());

    // Clear the vector
    myclassVector.clear();

    // Print the empty vector size
    std::cout </myclass></myclass></class></functional></algorithm></vector></iostream></code>

The above is the detailed content of Does `vector::erase()` Destroy Objects in a Vector of Pointers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
C   XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsC XML Libraries: Comparing and Contrasting OptionsApr 22, 2025 am 12:05 AM

There are four commonly used XML libraries in C: TinyXML-2, PugiXML, Xerces-C, and RapidXML. 1.TinyXML-2 is suitable for environments with limited resources, lightweight but limited functions. 2. PugiXML is fast and supports XPath query, suitable for complex XML structures. 3.Xerces-C is powerful, supports DOM and SAX resolution, and is suitable for complex processing. 4. RapidXML focuses on performance and parses extremely fast, but does not support XPath queries.

C   and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportC and XML: Exploring the Relationship and SupportApr 21, 2025 am 12:02 AM

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

C# vs. C  : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesC# vs. C : Understanding the Key Differences and SimilaritiesApr 20, 2025 am 12:03 AM

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

C# vs. C  : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsC# vs. C : History, Evolution, and Future ProspectsApr 19, 2025 am 12:07 AM

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

C# vs. C  : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceC# vs. C : Learning Curves and Developer ExperienceApr 18, 2025 am 12:13 AM

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C# vs. C  : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesC# vs. C : Object-Oriented Programming and FeaturesApr 17, 2025 am 12:02 AM

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

From XML to C  : Data Transformation and ManipulationFrom XML to C : Data Transformation and ManipulationApr 16, 2025 am 12:08 AM

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# vs. C  : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionC# vs. C : Memory Management and Garbage CollectionApr 15, 2025 am 12:16 AM

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MantisBT

MantisBT

Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version

PhpStorm Mac version

The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool