Home >Database >Mysql Tutorial >Memcached vs InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6

Memcached vs InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6

WBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWB
WBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOriginal
2016-06-07 16:36:18860browse

Memcached vs InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6: Some numbers from comparing Memcached with InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6: Keep in mind that the entire data set fits into the buffer pool, so thereare no reads from disk. However, there is write

Memcached vs InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6:

Some numbers from comparing Memcached with InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6:

Keep in mind that the entire data set fits into the buffer pool, so there are no reads from disk. However, there is write activity stemming from the fact that this is using InnoDB under the hood (redo logs, etc).

There is a significant impact on the speed so deciding which solution to use gets down to analysing the costs and complexity of maintaining another tool, the cost of Memcached warmup and the performance drop of using InnoDB Memcached.

Original title and link: Memcached vs InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6 (NoSQL database?myNoSQL)

Memcached vs InnoDB Memcached in MySQL 5.6
Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn