Using DOM operations to replace regular expressions in jQuery_jquery
In today's world where B/S structure clients are becoming more and more "fat", as a full-end programmer, you are likely to operate html strings on the front end. Note that you are operating html strings, not the current page. html.
For example, Ueditor, an online HTML rich text editor launched by Baidu, can create rich text documents online, and its functions are comparable to a streamlined version of Microsoft Word. Although Ueditor has the aura of Baidu, the actual effect is not very satisfactory. We need to process the html string it generates twice, such as setting the width of all images to 90%.
Through a certain method, we can get the html string in the text editor. Assume that the string is as follows:
Flower-like Sao Nian

Mysterious Pyramid

A dream-like life

But what to do next? The elegant processing of strings makes it easy for us to think of regular expressions. Can we use regular expressions here?
The answer is yes, try the regular effect first. Set the width of all images to 90%. The simplest way is to add the style attribute to the img tag and then specify the width in style.
Using regular rules, the first step is to match all img tags. Since the img tag does not necessarily have a style attribute, you must first determine whether there is a style attribute, and then directly add width: 90%; to the style attribute? No, this may overwrite other original attributes, so just add them directly. The addition will not overwrite them! Still not working, what if there is width originally. . .
I haven’t started writing regular expressions yet. Thinking about the process first, it is already very tedious. In fact, the implementation is even more complicated.
Fortunately, we can change our thinking and solve this problem with the help of jQuery.
The power of jQuery is that it can directly package an HTML string into a dom element. This dom element does not exist in the current page, it is placed in memory.
Through jQuery, you only need this piece of code:
//Define the container to facilitate obtaining the modified html string
//Use jQuery directly to wrap "". At this time, there will be a div element in the memory
var $container = $("");
//Assume this is the html string that needs to be modified
var html = "

//Directly insert the html string to be modified into the container
//jQuery is powerful enough to automatically wrap html strings into dom elements and then insert them into the div container in memory
$container.append(html);
//Search for all img tags in the container and traverse
$container.find("img").each(function(i,n){
//For each img element, directly modify the width attribute in its style attribute
//If the style attribute does not exist, add it automatically; if there is already a width attribute, modify it directly; no need to worry too much
$(n).css({
width: "90%"
});
});
//Get the modified html string, which is the html content of the container
alert($container.html());
The comments in the code are very detailed, so I won’t explain too much. We need to understand that jQuery can not only operate the html in the real page, but also the virtual html in the memory.
By comparing the two, I believe readers can immediately understand which method is better.
As Xiao Cai often says: If you think a problem can be solved, but it still hasn’t been solved after a long time, it’s probably that your thinking is wrong. Think about it from another angle, and the problem will be solved!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
