Source: PANews
Core view: A crypto-native synthetic USD stablecoin, somewhere between centralization and decentralization It is a structured passive income product between , which keeps assets on the chain and maintains stability through Delta neutrality while earning income.
Its ecological assets include:
Deposit st ETH into the Ethena protocol, that is USDe can be minted at a ratio of 1:1 USD. The deposited st ETH is sent to the third-party custodian, and the balance is mapped to the exchange through "Off-exchange Settlement". Ethena then opens a short ETH perpetual position on CEX to ensure that the collateral value remains delta neutral or at USD pricing remains unchanged.
OES (Off-exchange Settlement) is a settlement method for over-the-counter fund custody, which also takes into account the on-chain Transparent traceability and use of funds on centralized exchanges.
MPC Wallet is currently seen as the perfect choice for conglomerates to control a single pool of crypto assets. The MPC model distributes individual keys in separate units to respective wallet users, jointly managing escrow addresses.
However, as the market cools down and the number of long funds in the exchange decreases, the funding rate income will also decrease. Therefore, after entering April, the comprehensive income has an obvious downward trend. Currently, the Protocol Yield has decreased. to 2%, sUSDe Yield drops to 4%.
So in terms of yield, USDe is more dependent on the futures contract market in centralized exchanges, and will also be restricted by the scale of the futures market, because when the issuance of USDe exceeds the corresponding futures market capacity, It no longer meets the conditions for USDe to continue to expand.
The scalability of stablecoins is crucial, it refers to the conditions and possibilities for increasing the supply of stablecoins.
Stablecoin protocols like Maker often limit scalability due to over-collateralization requirements, requiring more than $1 in collateral to mint $1. Ethena is unique in that the main constraint on its scalability will be the ETH Perpetual Market Open Interest.
Open Interest refers to the total number of open positions on the exchange. Here, it specifically refers to the total value of open ETH perpetual contract positions on centralized exchanges. This number currently stands at approximately $12 billion (April 2024). This number reflects the current level of ETH positioning among market participants.
Comparing Ethena From its initial stage in early 2024, ETH Open Interest has grown from 8 billion to 12 billion. Recently, Ethena has supported the BTC market. The current BTC Open Interest is about 30 billion. The issuance of USDe is approximately US$2.3 billion. Of course, this includes the impact of many factors, such as the natural growth of market users, the price growth of ETH, BTC, etc. But the point here is that the scalability of USDe is closely related to the size of the perpetual market.
This is also the reason why Ethena cooperates with centralized exchanges. In 2023, the stablecoin project UXD Protocol on the Solana chain uses the same delta neutral method to issue stablecoins, but it chose decentralization on the chain. The exchange implements a hedging strategy, but due to the limited liquidity on the chain, when the stablecoin issuance reaches a certain scale, it means that a larger amount of short selling operations are required, which ultimately leads to negative funding rates and a large amount of additional costs. In addition, UXD used the leverage protocol Mango on the Solana chain for short selling. Later, Mango was attacked on the chain. Multiple reasons eventually led to the failure of the project.
So, can the market value of USDe reach USDT? DAI? Which level?
Currently, the market value of USDe is around US$2.3 billion, ranking fifth in the overall stablecoin market value ranking. It has surpassed most decentralized stablecoins, and is still US$3 billion away from DAI.
Currently, ETH Open Interest is close to the highest historical peak level, and BTC Open Interest has reached the highest historical peak. Therefore, the expansion of USDe’s market value requires increasing short positions of corresponding value in the existing market. This is detrimental to the current USDe Growth is challenging. As the main source of income for USDe, the funding rate is the mechanism used in perpetual contracts to adjust the price to match the spot market. This is usually achieved by paying periodic funding fees from long to short or from short to long. When excessive USDe is issued and short positions in the market increase, it may gradually push the funding rate down or even become negative. If the funding rate decreases or becomes negative, it may reduce Ethena’s earnings from the market.
As long as market sentiment remains unchanged, this is a typical market supply and demand balance problem, which requires finding a balance between expansion and yield. If we consider that the market sentiment is heading towards a bull market and the sentiment of going long when prices rise is high, the theoretical capacity for issuing USDe will increase. On the other hand, if the market sentiment is heading towards a bear market and the sentiment of going long when prices are falling decreases, the theoretical capacity for issuing USDe will decrease.
Combining yield and scalability, USDe may become a stable currency with high returns, limited scale in the short term, and long-term market trends.
Funding Rate Risk - When there are insufficient long positions in the market, or USDe is issued excessively, you will face negative returns on the funding rate, Ethena Fees need to be paid to longs as shorts. At this point though, Ethena concludes based on historical data that the market is positive most of the time. In addition, Ethena uses LST (such as stETH) as collateral for USDe, which can provide an additional margin of safety for negative rates in the form of stETH earning an annualized rate of 3-5%. However, it is worth noting that similar agreements have previously attempted to expand the scale of synthetic U.S. dollar stablecoins, but all failed due to inverted yields.
Custody risk - Fund custody relies on OES and centralized institutions that provide services. The bankruptcy of the exchange may cause losses to unsettled profits, and the bankruptcy of the OES institution may cause delays in obtaining funds. Although OES has adopted MPC and kept funds in the simplest possible way, there is still a theoretical possibility of theft of funds.
Liquidity Risk - If a position needs to be closed or adjusted quickly at a specific moment, a large amount of funds may face the problem of insufficient liquidity, especially in times of market stress or panic. Ethena attempts to alleviate and solve this problem by cooperating with centralized exchanges, such as progressive liquidation, gradual closing of positions, or other convenient policies to mitigate market shocks. This partnership may provide strong flexibility and advantages, but This also means the risk of centralization is introduced.
Asset anchoring risk - st ETH and ETH are theoretically anchored at 1:1, but there have been brief decouplings in history, mainly before the Shanghai upgrade. The future flow in Ethereum There may still be some unknown risks at the level of sexual derivatives. Asset decoupling could also trigger the liquidation of exchanges.
In order to deal with the series of risks mentioned above, Ethena has established an insurance fund. The funds come from the distribution of income by the agreement in each cycle, and part of it will be credited to the insurance fund.
The above is the detailed content of On the eve of drastic changes, Ethena initiated a deep penetration into the stablecoin market.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!