Just now, OpenAI officially issued a document refuting Musk and revealing screenshots of email exchanges over the past eight years.

The epic battle between OpenAI, the hottest technology company, and Musk, the world’s richest man, has reached a new level.

Just now, OpenAI used a long article "OpenAI and Elon Musk" to officially refute all of Musk's accusations.

The title is concise and the content is eye-catching. OpenAI released screenshots of email exchanges between the founding team and Musk over the past eight years, emphasizing its firm pursuit of its mission.

The article states at the beginning: "OpenAI is committed to ensuring that the benefits of artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefit all mankind, which includes both building safe and beneficial AGI and promoting a wide range of Interests. We will share the experiences we have gained in achieving this mission and reveal our relationship with Musk. We plan to refute all of Musk’s claims."

In the meantime , the exposure of some "mysterious information" in the email content has once again aggravated people's curiosity: What does the future of mankind mentioned by Musk depend on?

The article is co-signed by Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, John Schulman, Sam Altman, Wojciech Zaremba. When the technology circle is speculating whether Ilya has left OpenAI due to conflicts with Sam Altman, the signature is a disguised response: at least at this time, Ilya is still a core member trying to resist the storm OpenAI is facing.

A few days ago, Musk, the former OpenAI co-founder, wrote in a 46-page document , in a lawsuit document with a total of more than 14,000 words, it accused OpenAI of recklessly developing human-level artificial intelligence and handing it over to Microsoft. Musk’s lawsuit asks the court to force OpenAI to return to open source and prevent the company, its founders and backers such as Microsoft from profiting from it. (See: "Musk sues OpenAI: They made AGI and licensed it to Microsoft. This is a naked betrayal of the founding agreement" )

OpenAI CEO’s attitude towards this seems meaningful, making things even more mysterious:

Musk and It is difficult for outsiders to guess whether OpenAI has different ideas or conflicts of interests.

Everything that has not been revealed may be in this letter.

OpenAI’s counterattack

OpenAI wrote in the latest long letter:

We realized that building AGI would require far more resources than we originally thought

(In a 2015 email) Musk said that we should announce a 10 billion in start-up capital. But overall, OpenAI, a nonprofit, has raised just under $45 million from Musk and more than $90 million from other donors.

When they founded OpenAI in late 2015, Greg Brockman and Sam Altman initially planned to raise $100 million. Musk said in an email: "We need a much larger number than $100 million to avoid sounding like a hopeless goal... I think we should start with a $1 billion commitment... For others who have not yet I will be responsible for making up for the part provided."

We spent a lot of time trying to envision a feasible path to general artificial intelligence. In early 2017, we realized that building AGI would require a lot of computing power and began calculating how much compute AGI might require. We all know that we'll need more funding to successfully complete our mission -- probably billions of dollars per year, which is far more than any of us, especially Musk, thinks we can raise as a nonprofit.

We and Musk recognized the need for a for-profit entity to access these resources

as we discussed a for-profit structure to further our mission , Musk wants us to merge with Tesla, or for him to take full control of OpenAI.

Later, Musk left OpenAI, stating that there needed to be a competitor to Google/DeepMind, and that he would do it himself. He said he would support us in finding our own path.

What happened was that in late 2017, Musk and we decided that the next step was to create a for-profit entity. Musk wanted a majority stake, initial board control and the role of CEO, and he withheld funding during discussions. Reid Hoffman filled the gap in payroll and operations.

We were unable to agree with Musk on for-profit terms because we believe it would be contrary to the mission for any one individual to have absolute control over OpenAI. Musk then suggested merging OpenAI into Tesla. In early February 2018, Musk forwarded an email to us suggesting that OpenAI should "use Tesla as its cash cow," commenting: "That's absolutely right...Tesla is the only one that has any hope of working with AI." A comparable alternative to Google. Even so, the odds of countering Google are slim. It's just not zero."

## Soon, Musk chose to leave OpenAI, saying that the possibility of our success was zero, and he planned to build an AGI competitor within Tesla. When he left at the end of February 2018, he told our team that he supported us finding our own path to raising billions of dollars. In December 2018, Musk emailed us: "Even raising a few hundred million dollars won't be enough. Doing this requires raising billions of dollars every year quickly, or forget it."

We advance our mission by building beneficial tools that can be widely used

We enable our technology through open source contributions and more widely used to empower people and improve their daily lives.

We offer today’s most powerful AI broadly, including a free version used by hundreds of millions of people every day. For example, Albania is using OpenAI's tools to speed up its EU membership by 5.5 years; Digital Green is helping Kenya and India increase farmers' income and reduce the cost of agricultural extension services to 1/100 of the original price based on OpenAI's technology. ; Rhode Island's largest healthcare provider, Lifespan, is using GPT-4 to streamline its surgical consent form from college reading level to sixth grade reading level; Iceland is using GPT-4 to protect the Icelandic language.

Musk understands that our mission does not mean open source AGI. Ilya once told Musk, “As we get closer to building artificial intelligence, it makes sense to start reducing the level of openness. The ‘open’ in openAI means that once the artificial intelligence is built, everyone should benefit from the results of the artificial intelligence. , but it’s totally fine not to share scientific results..." At that time, Musk replied: "Yes (Yup)."

We are very sad because a person we deeply admire - he inspires us to reach higher progress towards our goals - he said we would fail and set up a rival company. When we started making meaningful progress toward OpenAI's mission without him, he sued us again.

We are focused on advancing our mission, and there is a long way to go. As we continue to improve our tools, we're excited to deploy these systems and make them available to everyone.

吃 Melon Netizen

OpenAI’s long letter response immediately detonated the social circle, and Chigua netizens moved up their benches to watch this "farce" ”.

Yam Peleg, an active software developer and founder of Deep trading, said, "Hurry up and eat new melons."

Well-known scholar and New York University professor Gary Marcus scoffed at OpenAI’s statement, saying bluntly that OpenAI said, “We continue to pursue our mission, such as not "Being restricted by generating profit returns, not being constrained by private interests, and seeking open source technology where applicable" is nonsense.

Now, Microsoft has exclusive ownership of OpenAI, with 49% of the profits going to Microsoft. Instead of helping all of humanity, OpenAI is stealing from artists and writers to increase its own profits.

More importantly, OpenAI has almost completely abandoned open source and has become one of the least open AI companies. Regardless of its feud with Musk, it would be disingenuous for OpenAI to claim that its mission remains unchanged.

In short, OpenAI violates the declaration when it was founded in 2015.

In addition, what everyone is more curious about is a sentence in the email between the two parties, "Unfortunately, the future of mankind is in the hands of ■■■ In hand."

Many netizens have speculated who is in ■■■? Google?

Some people also found an interesting point of view that they had never heard before, "OpenAI's openness (open) only means that everyone can benefit from the results of AI construction, not It’s perfectly fine to share it with the scientific community.”

Of course, more people are eager to see how Musk will respond.

Reference link: https://openai.com/blog/openai-elon-musk.

The above is the detailed content of Just now, OpenAI officially issued a document refuting Musk and revealing screenshots of email exchanges over the past eight years.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!