Home  >  Article  >  Technology peripherals  >  Performance comparison reveals: Intel Xeon 48 core and AMD EPYC 9545 face a tough battle

Performance comparison reveals: Intel Xeon 48 core and AMD EPYC 9545 face a tough battle

WBOY
WBOYforward
2023-11-27 11:43:581167browse

According to news on November 27, Intel plans to officially launch the codename Emerald on December 14. Rapids’ fifth-generation scalable Xeon processors, also launching Core Ultra Meteor Lake. Among the many recently exposed models, two eye-catching 48-core processors have been benchmarked in the GeekBench database.

性能对比揭示:Intel至强48核心与AMD EPYC 9545硬仗相对

According to the editor’s understanding, these two processors are Xeon Platinum 8558P and Xeon Platinum 8551C, both equipped with 48 cores and 96 threads. There is an error in the cache capacity identification in the database. The actual third-level cache should be 260MB instead of 16MB. The boost frequency was incorrectly labeled as 3.17GHz, and the actual data has not yet been confirmed.

性能对比揭示:Intel至强48核心与AMD EPYC 9545硬仗相对

性能对比揭示:Intel至强48核心与AMD EPYC 9545硬仗相对

The specifications of 8558P are as follows: the base frequency is 2.7GHz, the maximum is expected to reach 4.0GHz, and the thermal design power consumption is as high as 350W. The specifications of 8551C are as follows: the base frequency is 2.9GHz, and the acceleration frequency and thermal design power consumption are expected to be relatively low

Regarding the running performance, the single-core performance of both processors is around 1360 points, and Multi-core performance exceeded 50,000 and 48,000 respectively. Compared with AMD EPYC, which also has 48 cores Compared with 9545, although the single-core performance is slightly slower, the multi-core performance is only about 6% and 9% slower respectively. However, it is worth noting that the thermal design power consumption of AMD EPYC 9545 is only 290W.

性能对比揭示:Intel至强48核心与AMD EPYC 9545硬仗相对

Faced with the Intel processor with a power consumption of up to 350W and the latest tearer 7970X, although the latter only has 32 cores, it is completely overwhelmed in terms of single-core performance sex. The Ripper 7970X can accelerate to 5.3GHz. With a 50% increase in the number of cores, the multi-core performance is only less than 11% ahead.

Overall, Intel still faces huge market competition pressure in the short term. .

The above is the detailed content of Performance comparison reveals: Intel Xeon 48 core and AMD EPYC 9545 face a tough battle. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
This article is reproduced at:itbear.com. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete