This is the real dessert card, Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card review

In recent years, the price of graphics cards has remained high. People hope to use their limited budget to buy a cost-effective gaming graphics card, but such a graphics card has not appeared for a long time. Therefore, various installation recommendations have appeared on the Internet, teaching you how to achieve the desired results with a low budget by cutting the budget of other hardware. However, the real cost-effective approach is to reduce the price while ensuring the quality of the graphics card

Recently, AMD released a new 6000 series graphics card RX 6750 GRE, equipped with the much-loved The anticipated FSR3.0 and AFMF frame generation technology finally brings a glimmer of hope to players. The price of this graphics card is only about 2,000 yuan, which makes people look forward to it. What is the strength of this late "dessert card"? Can it make waves again in the price range below 2,500 yuan? Let’s take a look at the first version of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card we got.

Design

AMD has launched the GRE series, including 10GB and 12GB memory of two versions. This site tested the 12GB version, and my first impression is that this graphics card is very thin and light. In the current environment where "thickness" is regarded as strength, thin and light graphics cards have become even more valuable. The three-dimensional size of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card is 282*113*40 (including the blank). Although it is equipped with three fans, compared with thick cards, this graphics card is significantly more compatible with the chassis and will not cause too much weight-bearing pressure on the motherboard

GIGABYTERX 6750 GRE EAGLE The front of the Falcon 12G graphics card is Gigabyte's classic dark gray metal armor design, supplemented by three 8cm diameter black blade guide fans. Although it is simple, the texture is online. The GIGABYTE logo is printed on the surface of the fan shaft column, with blue circles on the edges. There is an irregular beveled decoration on the right side of the armor and the blue EAGLE logo is printed on it. These three fans support 3D start-stop and forward-reverse design. Through the internal composite heat pipe, they can efficiently remove core heat and improve heat dissipation efficiency.

The design of the graphics card back panel is relatively ordinary, with a dark gray matte sandblasted metal texture, a three-phase cut decorative strip in the middle, and EAGLE and GIGABYTE printed on the left and right respectively. Text. On the right side is a vertically designed vent, and through the surface you can see the extended heat dissipation fins.

The exposed part of the internal cooling module can be seen on one side of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card

On the other side, there is a RADEON logo printed on the left, proving that it is an AMD platform. On the right side is a translucent design with an RGB light strip, which supports 16.7 million color light adjustment and the light synchronization effect of GIGABYTE Smart Butler. The GIGABYTE logo is also printed on the surface.

The power supply interface of Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card is 8 6Pin, and only requires a PCIe power cable to connect

The graphics card output interface continues Gigabyte’s unique 2*HDMI2.1 2*DP1.4a design, which is more friendly to cable support.

Theoretical Performance

Before testing, let’s take a look at the hardware specifications of this Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card. Compared with the previously launched RX 6750XT, the RX 6750 GRE has not undergone major changes. It is still an RDNA2 mechanism, 7nm process technology, the number of stream processors and video memory specifications have basically remained the same. However, the video memory rate has been changed from RX 6750XT's 18GB to 16GB, and TGP has been slightly changed from 250W to 230W. Basically The frequency and acceleration frequency are also slightly lower, so you can basically regard it as a re-edition of the RX 6750XT. If the two are very close in actual performance, then the official 12GB version’s listing price of 2,379 yuan is really good.

We chose the 3A platform paired with the AMD 7800X3D processor in this test platform to ensure that there will be no bottleneck on the performance of this card. The specific configuration is shown in the figure below:

The content that needs to be rewritten is: first, the baking process. According to the official theoretical power consumption of 230W, the power consumption of this graphics card is not high. After actually using FurMark for a 15-minute baking test, the final power consumption was only 186W, the GPU temperature remained at 70 degrees, and the GPU core temperature was 84 degrees, which is neither very low nor very high. In terms of frequency, compared with the RTX 4060Ti, the frequency during baking is less than 200MHz, but the fan speed reaches 1963RPM, which is not low

Then let’s talk about the graphics card Conduct the 3D Mark graphics card stress test to see how its performance releases and stability performs under continuous high load conditions. After actual testing, the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card achieved a final score of 99.6%, easily passing the test.

In the 3DMark TimeSPY test based on DX12 game performance, the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card scored 12908 points. Compared with the historical results of RTX 4060, the lead is as high as 20.9%, and compared with the historical results of RX 6750XT, the gap is about 7%

Based on DX11 performance In the 3DMark FireStrike Extreme test, the graphics card score of Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G reached 17704 points. By comparison, the RTX 4060 has a historical score of 13,384 points, with a lead of about 32%; compared with the RX 6750XT’s historical score of 18,560 points, the gap is about 7%

In the 3D Mark Port Royal, a light-tracing project where N cards have an advantage, the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card scored 6572 points. For comparison, the RTX 4060's historical score was 6077 points, and the lead narrowed to 8.1. %, but RX 6750 GRE is still slightly better. Compared with the RX 6750XT's historical score of 6970 points, the gap is still 7%. No matter how you look at it, the knife skills are very accurate.

In the three theoretical test items, the RX 6750 GRE has a lead of 8%-32% to varying degrees compared to the RTX 4060. Compared with the predecessor RX 6750XT, the performance The difference is only single digits. Although the power consumption cannot be as low as the RTX 4060, it is still a surprise for ordinary players. However, whether this card is actually good to use depends on the gaming experience.

Game Test

As a card that gamers are looking forward to, this time we will test the performance of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card in detail at 1080P and 2K resolutions. , and will use RTX 4060 as a comparison to evaluate its cost performance at the same price. The specific settings of each game will be explained separately in the following text

First of all, in the online competitive game "CS2", which has greatly increased performance requirements after the upgrade, in order to show the performance upper limit To compare the performance with RTX 4060, we chose the highest image quality of 1080P for testing. The average frame number of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card reached 288 frames, and the 1% low frame rate was 213 frames. In comparison, the historical performance of the RTX 4060 averaged 248 frames, with a gap of 40 frames, making the RX 6750 GRE's lead reach 16%

Then we will play the game When the resolution is increased to 2K, the average number of frames of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card is 195 frames, and the 1% Low frame rate is 149 frames. In comparison, the RTX 4060's historical score is an average of 170 frames, a lead of 14.7%.

In the most popular competitive game "Rainbow Six: Siege", we use the built-in benchmark performance test for scoring. At the highest quality setting at 1080P resolution, the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE 12G graphics card achieved an average of 394 frames, with a minimum frame rate of 301 frames at 1%. In comparison, the historical score of RTX 4060 is also an average of 394 frames. This time the two sides tied The average frame rate of the Eagle 12G graphics card is 296 frames, and the 1% low frame rate is 201 frames. In comparison, the RTX 4060's average frame rate is 260 frames, which is again lower than the former. RX 6750 GRE leads by 13.8% this time

Then let’s look at the performance of 3A games. In the classic action game "Shadow of the Tomb Raider", the highest image quality of 1080P is selected to run the game with its own benchmark score. The average number of frames of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card is 165 frames, and the 1% Low frame rate is 126. frame. For comparison, the average number of frames of RTX 4060 is 150 frames, leading by 10%;

After switching to the highest 2K image quality, Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G The average frame rate of the graphics card is 115 frames, and the 1% low frame rate is 90 frames. In comparison, the RTX 4060 averaged 98 frames, a lead of 17.3%

In the classic racing game "Forza Horizon 5", choose 1080P resolution extreme image quality, running the built-in benchmark performance test, the average number of frames of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card is 111 frames, and the 1% Low frame is 92 frames. For comparison, the average number of frames of the RTX 4060 is 101 frames, with a lead of 10%; The average frame rate of the graphics card is 91 frames, and the 1% Low frame rate is 75 frames. For comparison, the average number of frames of the RTX 4060 is 82 frames, with a lead of 11%; 1080P highest image quality, running its own game benchmark test, the average number of frames of the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card is 101 frames, and the 1% Low frame rate is 11 frames. For comparison, the average number of frames of RTX 4060 is 81 frames, leading by 24%;

At 2K resolution, Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card The average frame rate is 78 frames, and the 1% Low frame rate is 20 frames. For comparison, the average number of frames of the RTX 4060 is 64, with a lead of 21%; "Cyberpunk: 2077", we chose 1080P super image quality, turned on FSR2.1, and ran the built-in game benchmark test. The average number of frames was 111 frames, and the 1% Low frame rate was 71 frames. For comparison, the average number of frames of the RTX 4060 is 89 frames, with a lead of 24%;

After switching to 2K resolution, the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card The average frame rate is 69 frames, and the 1% Low frame rate is 55 frames. For comparison, the RTX 4060 averaged 59 frames, a lead of 16.9%. After testing the above 6 games, it is not difficult to see that RX 6750 GRE has a clear advantage in game frames compared to RTX 4060. Whether it is online competitive games or 3A games, the former has a lead of at least 10%, and can reach up to With an average frame rate of 24%, its game performance is still very good.

Of course, this is not the end. Because the AMD platform also has FSR3.0 and AFMF frame generation technology. Since the first batch of FSR3.0 technology does not support 6000 series graphics cards, we are currently unable to give you specific tests. However, in addition to FSR3.0, AFMF frame generation technology can also be used to compete with the DLSS technology of RTX 4060. As we reported in October this year, this technology is available for AMD Radeon RX7000 and 6000 series GPUs and will add feature support to thousands of games.

AFMF frame generation technology is called AMD Fluid Motion Frames, and is officially called AMD smooth dynamic frame technology. By inserting frames, it improves the frame rate of the game while ensuring image quality, bringing players a smoother gaming experience. We have provided a beta version of the AMD driver that supports this feature, version number 23.30.01.02. After entering the driver, open the game tab, select the graphics card tab, and you can find this function switch in the GPU customization options. After manually turning it on, the following Anti-Lag low-latency function will also be automatically turned on to offset the increase in operation delay caused by frame insertion

##1080P It is the highest image quality and has the highest level of light tracing technology. The AFMF function is not turned on

##The highest image quality is 1080P. Using the highest level of light tracing technology, and turning on the AFMF function at the same timeThis site will use 2 games to show the better and worse basic frame rates after turning on the ray tracing effect corresponding to the game itself. In this case, whether using the AFMF function can improve the frame rate performance and game experience. First of all, when the frame rate is better, we chose "Shadow of the Tomb Raider". At the highest resolution of 1080P and with the highest level of ray tracing turned on, the average frame rate of the game was 91 frames. In terms of gaming experience It is already very good. After further turning on the AFMF function, the game frame rate increased to 148 frames, an increase of up to 62%.

At 2K resolution, "Cyberpunk 2077" running super ray tracing effect performs poorly by default, with an average frame rate of only 18 frames, making it almost impossible to play. . When we turned on the AFMF option in the AMD driver, the game frame rate doubled to 36 frames, but the gaming experience was still not ideal. However, don’t forget that there is also FSR2.1 functionality in Cyberpunk 2077. When we continue to turn it on, the frame rate in the same scene soars directly to 89 frames, completely smooth. Therefore, even if FSR3.0 is temporarily unavailable, the combination of AFMF frame generation technology and FSR2.1 functions can still greatly improve the gaming experience

Summary

After conducting all the tests, I have Its overall evaluation can be summarized in four words: "lives up to expectations". Considering that there is still a 7% gap between its theoretical performance and the RX 6750XT, I think it is still one step away from perfection, but it is enough to become a "dessert card" with excellent cost performance at this time. Compared with the RTX 4060 in the rival camp, in addition to its leading edge in performance, it also shows enough sincerity and promise in the core AI technology. After all, the official version of FSR3.0 has not yet been released, and there is still much to see in the future. There are many more dramas.

Return to the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card itself. Its excellent materials, compact size and good appearance are also very suitable for current mass consumers to install. needs. On AMD's home court, the "AAA platform", the Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card is not shy at all. Hardcore fans of the crimson camp can easily build a cost-effective gaming PC, which is its greatest value. In the vertical gaming field of the consumer market, RX 6750 GRE is destined to be a new star. As for whether it can become a "magic card" that is praised by many stars, let us wait and see.

Advertising Statement: The external links contained in this content (including but not limited to hyperlinks, QR codes, passwords, etc.) are intended to provide more information and save screening time. The results are for reference only. All articles on this website contain this statement

The above is the detailed content of This is the real dessert card, Gigabyte RX 6750 GRE EAGLE Falcon 12G graphics card review. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!