How to implement MySQL underlying optimization: advanced performance optimization of transaction locks and methods to avoid deadlocks

How to implement MySQL underlying optimization: advanced performance optimization of transaction locks and methods to avoid deadlocks

Introduction:
In the database system, transaction locks are guaranteed One of the important mechanisms for data consistency and concurrent access. However, in high-concurrency scenarios, transaction locks may cause performance issues and deadlocks. In order to improve MySQL performance, we need to perform advanced performance optimization on transaction locks and take measures to avoid deadlocks. This article will introduce advanced performance optimization methods of MySQL's underlying transaction locks and techniques to avoid deadlocks, and provide specific code examples.

1. Advanced performance optimization method for transaction locks

1. Reduce lock granularity
   In MySQL, lock granularity refers to the range size of the lock. Larger lock granularity will result in limited concurrent access, while smaller lock granularity will increase the possibility of lock contention. Therefore, we need to adjust the lock granularity according to actual scenarios to improve concurrency performance.

For example, suppose we have an order table, and we need to modify the order status and inventory quantity in a transaction. If all rows of the entire order table are locked, concurrency performance will be poor. Instead, we can lock only the order lines that need to be modified to reduce the lock granularity.

Sample code:

START TRANSACTION;
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE order_id = <order_id> FOR UPDATE;
-- 这里可以执行一些修改操作
COMMIT;

2. Improve lock concurrency performance
   The lock in MySQL is implemented through the database engine. Different engines handle locks differently, and the specific optimization methods will also be different.

The InnoDB engine is MySQL's default transaction engine, which uses row-level locking. In high concurrency scenarios, you can improve the lock concurrency performance of the InnoDB engine through the following methods:

(1) Adjust the transaction isolation level: In some specific scenarios, you can adjust the transaction isolation level to read uncommitted Or read committed to reduce lock contention.

(2) Reasonable use of indexes: By using indexes on frequently accessed columns, unnecessary full table scans can be reduced, thereby reducing lock holding time.

Sample code:

START TRANSACTION;
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED;
-- 在这里执行一些查询操作
COMMIT;

3. Reduce the lock waiting time
   When a transaction requests a locked resource that is occupied by another transaction, it needs to wait until the lock is available. In order to reduce the lock waiting time, the following measures can be taken:

(1) Minimize the length of the transaction: The longer the transaction holds the lock, the longer other transactions will wait for the lock. Therefore, operations that may result in long waits for locks can be split into multiple shorter transactions.

(2) Reasonable lock timeout settings: When a transaction waits for a lock for more than a certain threshold, the wait can be automatically terminated by setting the lock timeout to avoid long lock waits.

Sample code:

SET innodb_lock_wait_timeout = 5;

2. Methods to avoid deadlock

1. Use a reasonable transaction sequence
   Deadlock refers to two or more transactions A situation in which each other is waiting for the other party to release the lock and cannot continue execution. In order to avoid the occurrence of deadlock, we can operate in a fixed transaction order, thereby reducing the probability of deadlock.

For example, suppose we have two transactions, one transaction needs to modify the data of the order table, and the other transaction needs to modify the data of the inventory table. If two transactions acquire locks in the same order, no deadlock will occur.

Sample code:

@Transactional
public void updateOrderAndInventory(int orderId, int inventoryId) {
    synchronized (Order.class) {
        updateOrder(orderId);
    }
    synchronized (Inventory.class) {
        updateInventory(inventoryId);
    }
}

2. Set a reasonable deadlock timeout
   When a deadlock occurs in a transaction, MySQL will detect and select one of the transactions to roll back, Thereby lifting the deadlock. In order to prevent deadlock from existing for a long time, we can set a reasonable deadlock timeout.

Sample code:

SET innodb_deadlock_detect = ON;
SET innodb_lock_wait_timeout = 5;

Conclusion:
Advanced performance optimization of MySQL's underlying transaction lock and methods to avoid deadlock are very important to improve database concurrency performance and ensure data consistency . By reducing lock granularity, improving lock concurrency performance, and reducing lock waiting time, the performance of MySQL transaction locks can be effectively improved. At the same time, by properly setting the transaction sequence and deadlock timeout, the occurrence of deadlock can be effectively avoided. By rationally selecting and using these methods, we can help us optimize the performance of MySQL's underlying transaction lock and improve the concurrency performance and stability of the application.

Reference materials:
1.《High Performance MySQL》
2.《MySQL Official Documentation》

The above is the detailed content of How to implement MySQL underlying optimization: advanced performance optimization of transaction locks and methods to avoid deadlocks. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!