


How Nginx implements access control configuration based on request source domain name
How Nginx implements access control configuration based on the request source domain name requires specific code examples
Nginx is a high-performance web server software. It can not only be used as a static The file server can also be configured to achieve flexible access control. This article will introduce how to implement access control configuration based on the request source domain name through Nginx, and provide specific code examples.
The Nginx configuration file is usually located in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf. We can add relevant configurations to this file. Here is an example of a basic Nginx configuration file:
http { server { listen 80; server_name example.com; location / { proxy_pass http://localhost:8000; } } }
In the above example, we listen to port 80 and forward all requests to the local port 8000. The server_name directive is used in this configuration to specify the domain name that accepts requests. By default, Nginx will accept requests from all domain names. If you want to implement access control configuration based on the domain name of the request source, you can use the if directive combined with $request_header to achieve this.
The following is an example:
http { server { listen 80; if ($http_host ~* "^(www.)?example.com$") { location / { proxy_pass http://localhost:8000; } } if ($http_host ~* "^(www.)?example2.com$") { return 403; } } }
In the above example, we use two if instructions to implement access control configuration based on the request source domain name. In the first if block, we use the $http_host variable to match the example.com domain name and forward the request to the local port 8000. In the second if block, we also use the $http_host variable to match the example2.com domain name and return a 403 error.
It should be noted that using the if instruction in Nginx will cause performance losses. If possible, it is recommended to use regular expressions for domain name matching and use the location directive to achieve more efficient configuration.
In addition to using the if directive, Nginx also provides many other directives and modules for implementing more complex access control configurations, such as the ngx_http_access_module module, ngx_http_auth_basic_module module, etc. You can choose the appropriate configuration method according to actual needs.
To summarize, access control configuration based on the domain name of the request source can be implemented through Nginx. By using the if directive in combination with the $http_host variable in the configuration file, conditional judgment can be made based on the requested domain name, thereby achieving flexible access control. Of course, in order to ensure performance, it is recommended to choose an appropriate configuration method and combine it with other modules to achieve more complex control requirements.
The above is the detailed content of How Nginx implements access control configuration based on request source domain name. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

NGINXUnit can be used to deploy and manage applications in multiple languages. 1) Install NGINXUnit. 2) Configure it to run different types of applications such as Python and PHP. 3) Use its dynamic configuration function for application management. Through these steps, you can efficiently deploy and manage applications and improve project efficiency.

NGINX is more suitable for handling high concurrent connections, while Apache is more suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and module extensions are required. 1.NGINX is known for its high performance and low resource consumption, and is suitable for high concurrency. 2.Apache is known for its stability and rich module extensions, which are suitable for complex configuration needs.

NGINXUnit improves application flexibility and performance with its dynamic configuration and high-performance architecture. 1. Dynamic configuration allows the application configuration to be adjusted without restarting the server. 2. High performance is reflected in event-driven and non-blocking architectures and multi-process models, and can efficiently handle concurrent connections and utilize multi-core CPUs.

NGINX and Apache are both powerful web servers, each with unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of performance, scalability and efficiency. 1) NGINX performs well when handling static content and reverse proxying, suitable for high concurrency scenarios. 2) Apache performs better when processing dynamic content and is suitable for projects that require rich module support. The selection of a server should be decided based on project requirements and scenarios.

NGINX is suitable for handling high concurrent requests, while Apache is suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and functional extensions are required. 1.NGINX adopts an event-driven, non-blocking architecture, and is suitable for high concurrency environments. 2. Apache adopts process or thread model to provide a rich module ecosystem that is suitable for complex configuration needs.

NGINX can be used to improve website performance, security, and scalability. 1) As a reverse proxy and load balancer, NGINX can optimize back-end services and share traffic. 2) Through event-driven and asynchronous architecture, NGINX efficiently handles high concurrent connections. 3) Configuration files allow flexible definition of rules, such as static file service and load balancing. 4) Optimization suggestions include enabling Gzip compression, using cache and tuning the worker process.

NGINXUnit supports multiple programming languages and is implemented through modular design. 1. Loading language module: Load the corresponding module according to the configuration file. 2. Application startup: Execute application code when the calling language runs. 3. Request processing: forward the request to the application instance. 4. Response return: Return the processed response to the client.

NGINX and Apache have their own advantages and disadvantages and are suitable for different scenarios. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency and low resource consumption scenarios. 2. Apache is suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and rich modules are required. By comparing their core features, performance differences, and best practices, you can help you choose the server software that best suits your needs.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.