search
HomeTechnology peripheralsAIImageNet label error removed, model ranking changed significantly

Previously, ImageNet became a hot topic because of the problem of label errors. You may be surprised to hear this number. There are at least 100,000 labels with problems. Studies based on incorrect labels may have to be overturned and repeated.

From this point of view, managing the quality of data sets is still very important.

Many people will use the ImageNet data set as a benchmark, but based on the ImageNet pre-trained model, the final results may vary due to data quality.

In this article, Kenichi Higuchi, an engineer from Adansons Company, re-studies the ImageNet data set in the article "Are we done with ImageNet?", and after removing the wrong label data, re-evaluates it and publishes it on torchvision model.

Remove erroneous data from ImageNet and re-evaluate the model

This paper divides labeling errors in ImageNet into three categories, as follows.

(1) Data with incorrect labeling

(2) Data corresponding to multiple labels

(3) Data that does not belong to any label

ImageNet label error removed, model ranking changed significantly

In summary, there are approximately more than 14,000 erroneous data. Considering that the number of evaluation data is 50,000, it can be seen that the proportion of erroneous data is extremely high. The figure below shows some representative error data.

ImageNet label error removed, model ranking changed significantly

Method

Without retraining the model, this study only excludes incorrectly labeled data, That is, the above-mentioned type (1) erroneous data, and excluding all erroneous data from the evaluation data, that is, (1)-(3) erroneous data, to recheck the accuracy of the model.

In order to delete error data, a metadata file describing the label error information is required. In this metadata file, if it contains errors of type (1)-(3), the information will be described in the "correction" attribute.

ImageNet label error removed, model ranking changed significantly

The study used a tool called Adansons Base, which filters data by linking datasets to metadata. 10 models were tested here as shown below.

ImageNet label error removed, model ranking changed significantly

10 image classification models used for testing

Results

The results are shown in the table below (numeric values is the accuracy in %, the number in brackets is the ranking)

ImageNet label error removed, model ranking changed significantly

The results of 10 classification models

With All Eval data is the baseline. Excluding incorrect data types (1), the accuracy increases by an average of 3.122 points. Excluding all incorrect data (1) to (3), the accuracy increases by an average of 11.743 points.

As expected, excluding erroneous data, the accuracy rate is improved across the board. There is no doubt that compared with clean data, erroneous data is prone to errors.

The accuracy ranking of the model changed when the evaluation was performed without excluding erroneous data, and when erroneous data (1)~(3) were all excluded.

In this article, there are 3,670 erroneous data (1), accounting for 7.34% of the total 50,000 pieces of data. After removal, the accuracy rate increased by about 3.22 points on average. When erroneous data is removed, the data scale changes, and a simple comparison of accuracy rates may be biased.

Conclusion

Although not specifically emphasized, it is important to use accurately labeled data when doing evaluation training.

Previous studies may have drawn incorrect conclusions when comparing accuracy between models. So the data should be evaluated first, but can this really be used to evaluate the performance of the model?

Many models using deep learning often disdain to reflect on the data, but are eager to improve accuracy and other evaluation metrics through the performance of the model, even if the evaluation data contains erroneous data. Not processed accurately.

When creating your own data sets, such as when applying AI in business, creating high-quality data sets is directly related to improving the accuracy and reliability of AI. The experimental results of this paper show that simply improving data quality can improve accuracy by about 10 percentage points, which demonstrates the importance of improving not only the model but also the data set when developing AI systems.

However, ensuring the quality of the data set is not easy. While increasing the amount of metadata is important to properly assess the quality of AI models and data, it can be cumbersome to manage, especially with unstructured data.

The above is the detailed content of ImageNet label error removed, model ranking changed significantly. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:51CTO.COM. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
从VAE到扩散模型:一文解读以文生图新范式从VAE到扩散模型:一文解读以文生图新范式Apr 08, 2023 pm 08:41 PM

1 前言在发布DALL·E的15个月后,OpenAI在今年春天带了续作DALL·E 2,以其更加惊艳的效果和丰富的可玩性迅速占领了各大AI社区的头条。近年来,随着生成对抗网络(GAN)、变分自编码器(VAE)、扩散模型(Diffusion models)的出现,深度学习已向世人展现其强大的图像生成能力;加上GPT-3、BERT等NLP模型的成功,人类正逐步打破文本和图像的信息界限。在DALL·E 2中,只需输入简单的文本(prompt),它就可以生成多张1024*1024的高清图像。这些图像甚至

找不到中文语音预训练模型?中文版 Wav2vec 2.0和HuBERT来了找不到中文语音预训练模型?中文版 Wav2vec 2.0和HuBERT来了Apr 08, 2023 pm 06:21 PM

Wav2vec 2.0 [1],HuBERT [2] 和 WavLM [3] 等语音预训练模型,通过在多达上万小时的无标注语音数据(如 Libri-light )上的自监督学习,显著提升了自动语音识别(Automatic Speech Recognition, ASR),语音合成(Text-to-speech, TTS)和语音转换(Voice Conversation,VC)等语音下游任务的性能。然而这些模型都没有公开的中文版本,不便于应用在中文语音研究场景。 WenetSpeech [4] 是

普林斯顿陈丹琦:如何让「大模型」变小普林斯顿陈丹琦:如何让「大模型」变小Apr 08, 2023 pm 04:01 PM

“Making large models smaller”这是很多语言模型研究人员的学术追求,针对大模型昂贵的环境和训练成本,陈丹琦在智源大会青源学术年会上做了题为“Making large models smaller”的特邀报告。报告中重点提及了基于记忆增强的TRIME算法和基于粗细粒度联合剪枝和逐层蒸馏的CofiPruning算法。前者能够在不改变模型结构的基础上兼顾语言模型困惑度和检索速度方面的优势;而后者可以在保证下游任务准确度的同时实现更快的处理速度,具有更小的模型结构。陈丹琦 普

解锁CNN和Transformer正确结合方法,字节跳动提出有效的下一代视觉Transformer解锁CNN和Transformer正确结合方法,字节跳动提出有效的下一代视觉TransformerApr 09, 2023 pm 02:01 PM

由于复杂的注意力机制和模型设计,大多数现有的视觉 Transformer(ViT)在现实的工业部署场景中不能像卷积神经网络(CNN)那样高效地执行。这就带来了一个问题:视觉神经网络能否像 CNN 一样快速推断并像 ViT 一样强大?近期一些工作试图设计 CNN-Transformer 混合架构来解决这个问题,但这些工作的整体性能远不能令人满意。基于此,来自字节跳动的研究者提出了一种能在现实工业场景中有效部署的下一代视觉 Transformer——Next-ViT。从延迟 / 准确性权衡的角度看,

Stable Diffusion XL 现已推出—有什么新功能,你知道吗?Stable Diffusion XL 现已推出—有什么新功能,你知道吗?Apr 07, 2023 pm 11:21 PM

3月27号,Stability AI的创始人兼首席执行官Emad Mostaque在一条推文中宣布,Stable Diffusion XL 现已可用于公开测试。以下是一些事项:“XL”不是这个新的AI模型的官方名称。一旦发布稳定性AI公司的官方公告,名称将会更改。与先前版本相比,图像质量有所提高与先前版本相比,图像生成速度大大加快。示例图像让我们看看新旧AI模型在结果上的差异。Prompt: Luxury sports car with aerodynamic curves, shot in a

五年后AI所需算力超100万倍!十二家机构联合发表88页长文:「智能计算」是解药五年后AI所需算力超100万倍!十二家机构联合发表88页长文:「智能计算」是解药Apr 09, 2023 pm 07:01 PM

人工智能就是一个「拼财力」的行业,如果没有高性能计算设备,别说开发基础模型,就连微调模型都做不到。但如果只靠拼硬件,单靠当前计算性能的发展速度,迟早有一天无法满足日益膨胀的需求,所以还需要配套的软件来协调统筹计算能力,这时候就需要用到「智能计算」技术。最近,来自之江实验室、中国工程院、国防科技大学、浙江大学等多达十二个国内外研究机构共同发表了一篇论文,首次对智能计算领域进行了全面的调研,涵盖了理论基础、智能与计算的技术融合、重要应用、挑战和未来前景。论文链接:​https://spj.scien

​什么是Transformer机器学习模型?​什么是Transformer机器学习模型?Apr 08, 2023 pm 06:31 PM

译者 | 李睿审校 | 孙淑娟​近年来, Transformer 机器学习模型已经成为深度学习和深度神经网络技术进步的主要亮点之一。它主要用于自然语言处理中的高级应用。谷歌正在使用它来增强其搜索引擎结果。OpenAI 使用 Transformer 创建了著名的 GPT-2和 GPT-3模型。自从2017年首次亮相以来,Transformer 架构不断发展并扩展到多种不同的变体,从语言任务扩展到其他领域。它们已被用于时间序列预测。它们是 DeepMind 的蛋白质结构预测模型 AlphaFold

AI模型告诉你,为啥巴西最可能在今年夺冠!曾精准预测前两届冠军AI模型告诉你,为啥巴西最可能在今年夺冠!曾精准预测前两届冠军Apr 09, 2023 pm 01:51 PM

说起2010年南非世界杯的最大网红,一定非「章鱼保罗」莫属!这只位于德国海洋生物中心的神奇章鱼,不仅成功预测了德国队全部七场比赛的结果,还顺利地选出了最终的总冠军西班牙队。不幸的是,保罗已经永远地离开了我们,但它的「遗产」却在人们预测足球比赛结果的尝试中持续存在。在艾伦图灵研究所(The Alan Turing Institute),随着2022年卡塔尔世界杯的持续进行,三位研究员Nick Barlow、Jack Roberts和Ryan Chan决定用一种AI算法预测今年的冠军归属。预测模型图

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator

AI Hentai Generator

Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Tools

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

EditPlus Chinese cracked version

Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

SublimeText3 English version

SublimeText3 English version

Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux new version

SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.