search
HomeTechnology peripheralsAINature's new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

​This article is reprinted with the authorization of AI New Media Qubit (public account ID: QbitAI). Please contact the source for reprinting.

Facing ChatGPT, Nature finally couldn’t sit still.

This week, the fate of this authoritative academic publishing organization has been clarified regarding a series of issues such as ChatGPT’s ghostwriting of academic articles and being listed as an author.

Specifically, Nature lists two principles:

(1) Any large language model tool (such as ChatGPT) cannot become the author of the paper;
(2) If relevant tools have been used in the creation of the paper, the author should clearly state in the "Methods" or "Acknowledgments" or appropriate section.

The above requirements have now been added to the author submission guidelines.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

#In recent times, ChatGPT has become more and more involved in the academic and research circles.

In a paper on the anti-aging application of rapamycin in December last year, ChatGPT was listed as a work, causing controversy in the industry. In addition to this article, there are many studies listing ChatGPT as the author.

Nature has also noticed this situation. A survey they conducted in December showed that 20% of the 293 professors interviewed had discovered or witnessed students using ChatGPT to complete assignments or papers. More people are worried about this.

This time, the statement issued by Nature is precisely hoping to characterize various disputes.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

Multiple papers have listed ChatGPT as the author

ChatGPT was launched by OpenAI at the end of November last year because its performance significantly surpassed previous large languages. Model (LLM) quickly became the No. 1 "Sky Monkey" at the end of the year and the beginning of the year.

In the fields of new media, film and television, software development, game interaction and other fields, ChatGPT is quickly used to assist production and improve efficiency.

Xueyan Circle is no exception.

According to Nature statistics, there are at least 4 papers using ChatGPT and listing it as an author.

One of the preprints was published on the medical preprint database medRxiv in December 2022. This paper studies the performance of ChatGPT on the United States Medical Licensing Examination. Although the research is about ChatGPT, ChatGPT is also listed in the author column.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

Another paper was published in the journal "Nurse Education Practice" on the pros and cons of open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education. Likewise, ChatGPT is listed as an author:

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

The third paper comes from Insilico Medicine, an AI drug research and development company. It is about a new drug rapamycin and was published in "Oncoscience". Likewise, ChatGPT is listed as the author.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

The fourth article is a bit "old" and was published in June 2022. The topic discussed is-the ability of AI to generate papers. The AI ​​listed in the author column is not ChatGPT, but GPT-3, which was released earlier.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

Although the above research content is somewhat related to generative language models, for serious scientific research activities, use "research objects" to write papers and list them as authors Column, inevitably triggered controversy and doubts.

And even if AI is not listed as the author, the use of ChatGPT in academic and research circles is becoming more and more common.

As mentioned earlier, Alex Zhavoronkov, CEO of Insilico Medicine, an AI drug research and development company, revealed that his institution has published more than 80 papers generated by AI tools.

British professor Mike Sharples has been paying attention to the impact of generative AI on academic research. Not long ago, he personally demonstrated on Twitter how to use a large language model to generate an academic paper in 10 minutes. He described step by step how he used AI to generate a summary based on the title, which also triggered a lot of discussion.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

It is more common for students to use ChatGPT to help write papers, generate code, and complete assignments. Currently, educational institutions in some areas of the United States have banned the use of this tool.

Just last week, a student at Northern Michigan University relied on ChatGPT to write an essay with the highest score in the class.

Interestingly, the student was caught because the article he submitted was so logically coherent and well-structured that the instructor only learned the truth after questioning him.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author
##△ Northern Michigan University

It needs to be made clear that the above packet capture was just accidental , and more often than not, the generated content has made it difficult for scientists to distinguish between authenticity and fiction.

A previous article in Nature pointed out that after the release of ChatGPT, a research team at Northwestern University in Illinois was exploring whether scientists could recognize the abstracts of medical papers generated using this AI tool.

The results found that all AI-generated summaries passed the plagiarism detector, and during manual review, 32% of the AI-generated summaries were considered to be completed by real humans.

Identification tools are already being developed

The nature’s failure shows that they attach great importance to the problems caused by ChatGPT.

In the latest content, Nature stated that the academic and research circles are worried that students and researchers may use content generated by large-scale language models as text written by themselves. In addition to taking risks, the above process also Can produce unreliable research conclusions.

Especially for ChatGPT, the Nature team and many publishers and platforms believe that this tool cannot be responsible for the integrity and content of scientific papers.

One side evidence is that the technology media CNET has exposed in the past two days that 41 of the 77 pieces of content written by the platform's AI have errors. At present, the platform has corrected them and stated that it will suspend the production of content in this way. .

It is precisely based on concerns about the above situation that Nature has issued relevant regulations.

As for how to distinguish AI-generated content?

Nature said that currently the raw output of ChatGPT can be discovered through careful inspection, especially when it comes to specific scientific work, the content may contain the simplest errors and general boring wording. In addition, Nature also said that they are still developing related recognition technology.

It is worth mentioning that relevant identification tools have also been developed.

For example, OpenAI’s own GPT-2 Output Detector can more accurately identify AI-generated text by inputting more than 50 characters (tokens).

Another example is Edward Tian, ​​a Princeton student, who also made a related tool GPTZero.

Natures new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author

However, not all university professors and teachers have a negative attitude towards AI generation tools.

For example, Ethan Mollick, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, went the other way and required students to use ChatGPT to complete class assignments, believing that this was embracing emerging technology tools.

A worker at medRxiv, a paper publishing platform, also said that ChatGPT is not a new problem.

He believes that before, researchers have tried to sneak in the names of pets and fictional characters. Therefore, they believe that the core of the

problem is the need to continue to strengthen inspections.

Finally, have you used ChatGPT in your scientific research work?

The above is the detailed content of Nature's new rules: You can use ChatGPT to write papers, but not to be listed as an author. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:51CTO.COM. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
Word文本框没有旋转按钮怎么办Word文本框没有旋转按钮怎么办Dec 08, 2022 am 09:50 AM

Word文本框没有旋转按钮的解决办法:打开兼容模式文档后按F12键另存为高版本,再打开就可以了。

令人惊艳的4个ChatGPT项目,开源了!令人惊艳的4个ChatGPT项目,开源了!Mar 30, 2023 pm 02:11 PM

自从 ChatGPT、Stable Diffusion 发布以来,各种相关开源项目百花齐放,着实让人应接不暇。今天,着重挑选几个优质的开源项目分享给大家,对我们的日常工作、学习生活,都会有很大的帮助。

Word文档拆分后的子文档字体格式变了怎么办Word文档拆分后的子文档字体格式变了怎么办Feb 07, 2023 am 11:40 AM

Word文档拆分后的子文档字体格式变了的解决办法:1、在大纲模式拆分文档前,先选中正文内容创建一个新的样式,给样式取一个与众不同的名字;2、选中第二段正文内容,通过选择相似文本的功能将剩余正文内容全部设置为新建样式格式;3、进入大纲模式进行文档拆分,操作完成后打开子文档,正文字体格式就是拆分前新建的样式内容。

学术专用版ChatGPT火了,一键完成论文润色、代码解释、报告生成学术专用版ChatGPT火了,一键完成论文润色、代码解释、报告生成Apr 04, 2023 pm 01:05 PM

用 ChatGPT 辅助写论文这件事,越来越靠谱了。 ChatGPT 发布以来,各个领域的从业者都在探索 ChatGPT 的应用前景,挖掘它的潜力。其中,学术文本的理解与编辑是一种极具挑战性的应用场景,因为学术文本需要较高的专业性、严谨性等,有时还需要处理公式、代码、图谱等特殊的内容格式。现在,一个名为「ChatGPT 学术优化(chatgpt_academic)」的新项目在 GitHub 上爆火,上线几天就在 GitHub 上狂揽上万 Star。项目地址:https://github.com/

30行Python代码就可以调用ChatGPT API总结论文的主要内容30行Python代码就可以调用ChatGPT API总结论文的主要内容Apr 04, 2023 pm 12:05 PM

阅读论文可以说是我们的日常工作之一,论文的数量太多,我们如何快速阅读归纳呢?自从ChatGPT出现以后,有很多阅读论文的服务可以使用。其实使用ChatGPT API非常简单,我们只用30行python代码就可以在本地搭建一个自己的应用。 阅读论文可以说是我们的日常工作之一,论文的数量太多,我们如何快速阅读归纳呢?自从ChatGPT出现以后,有很多阅读论文的服务可以使用。其实使用ChatGPT API非常简单,我们只用30行python代码就可以在本地搭建一个自己的应用。使用 Python 和 C

vscode配置中文插件,带你无需注册体验ChatGPT!vscode配置中文插件,带你无需注册体验ChatGPT!Dec 16, 2022 pm 07:51 PM

​面对一夜爆火的 ChatGPT ,我最终也没抵得住诱惑,决定体验一下,不过这玩意要注册需要外国手机号以及科学上网,将许多人拦在门外,本篇博客将体验当下爆火的 ChatGPT 以及无需注册和科学上网,拿来即用的 ChatGPT 使用攻略,快来试试吧!

用ChatGPT秒建大模型!OpenAI全新插件杀疯了,接入代码解释器一键get用ChatGPT秒建大模型!OpenAI全新插件杀疯了,接入代码解释器一键getApr 04, 2023 am 11:30 AM

ChatGPT可以联网后,OpenAI还火速介绍了一款代码生成器,在这个插件的加持下,ChatGPT甚至可以自己生成机器学习模型了。 ​上周五,OpenAI刚刚宣布了惊爆的消息,ChatGPT可以联网,接入第三方插件了!而除了第三方插件,OpenAI也介绍了一款自家的插件「代码解释器」,并给出了几个特别的用例:解决定量和定性的数学问题;进行数据分析和可视化;快速转换文件格式。此外,Greg Brockman演示了ChatGPT还可以对上传视频文件进行处理。而一位叫Andrew Mayne的畅销作

ChatGPT教我学习PHP中AOP的实现(附代码)ChatGPT教我学习PHP中AOP的实现(附代码)Mar 30, 2023 am 10:45 AM

本篇文章给大家带来了关于php的相关知识,其中主要介绍了我是怎么用ChatGPT学习PHP中AOP的实现,感兴趣的朋友下面一起来看一下吧,希望对大家有帮助。

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator

AI Hentai Generator

Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

R.E.P.O. Energy Crystals Explained and What They Do (Yellow Crystal)
2 weeks agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Repo: How To Revive Teammates
4 weeks agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Hello Kitty Island Adventure: How To Get Giant Seeds
3 weeks agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Safe Exam Browser

Safe Exam Browser

Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools